View Poll Results: The "Most Golden" of the Golden Ages - Ranking Golden Eras

Voters
26. This poll is closed
  • 1) Egypt (the New Kingdom) 1480 B.C. to 1200 B.C.

    0 0%
  • 2) Greco/Macdedonian Era 490 B.C. to 322 B.C.

    7 26.92%
  • 3) Rome 202 B.C. to 378 C.E.

    11 42.31%
  • 4) East Roman Empire/Byzantine 843 to 1071

    1 3.85%
  • 5) Abbasid Caliphate 762 to 865

    0 0%
  • 6) Tang Dynasty 618 to 755

    4 15.38%
  • 7) Ottoman Empire 1451 to 1571

    1 3.85%
  • 8) Spain 1492 to 1588

    0 0%
  • 9) France 1624 to 1763

    0 0%
  • 10) England 1815 to 1914

    2 7.69%
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: The "Most Golden" of the Golden Ages

  1. #1
    Master of the Horse Senior Member Pindar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The base of Yggdrasil
    Posts
    3,710

    Default

    Many kingdoms/empires/nations have experienced a time of regional hegemony. Excluding the present era, which of the above do you consider the most golden, the most glorious?

    "We are lovers of beauty without extravagance and of learning without loss of vigor." -Thucydides

    "The secret of Happiness is Freedom, and the secret of Freedom, Courage." -Thucydides

  2. #2
    Cheeky Bastage Member Hobot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    70

    Default

    I voted for Rome, they had an extremely long lasting and unprecedented Empire that included many religions, peoples and areas of the world...all of which were now interconnected. It's rather amazing, but if you look at the map of MTW, the Roman empire either encompassed or influenced pretty much all of it. They had a huge cohesive system and the Empire for all its faults was a fairly efficient and productive entity. In fact I believe that if communication and transportation were more easily available to the Romans, that the Empire would have last many centuries longer...perhaps never have fallen at all? For it is because they could not communicate or travel fast enough, that distant areas of the Empire could gain a measure of autonomy and grow insubordinate to the whole. Heck, it could have even grown into what the EU is becoming today

    Romans rox...

    *Disclaimer: I'm a big fan of Roman history*
    Every man dies, not every man really lives.

  3. #3
    Member Member Drucius's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    The Capital
    Posts
    156

    Default

    I think you'll find that the English didn't forge the empire single-handedly.
    Oh, fud.

  4. #4
    Member Member Portuguese Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,401

    Default

    Portugal ain't in the poll so i won't vote. We had the first worldwide empire, although for a little while...

    If i had to vote i would vote for Spain. They had the other half of the globe...
    Legacy for the airwaves.

  5. #5
    Member Member Michiel de Ruyter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Delft, The Netherlands
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Write-in vote:

    The Dutch Republic (1609 - 1672): They are considered by some to be the third hegemon in world-history (besides the obvious two: present US and Victorian UK). Maybe not militarily, but they had a financial stranglehold on pretty much the rest of the world (to the dismay of most prominent Louis XIV).
    A country with so much power that it became the envy of the rest of the world... up to the point where it had to face both France and the UK at the same time...

    Gifts: Rembrandt, Vermeer and many other painters. Many scientists, who, among others invented the telescope, microscope, made many important steps in the worlds of science and even in law and philosphy. Or developed older techniques, and exanded upon them. Others: shares and stockholding and an improved banking system.
    For a small country, we have kicked some really good (naval) butt...

  6. #6
    Member Member Portuguese Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,401

    Default

    Hmmm you little dutch pirates, always trying to steal Brazil from us
    Legacy for the airwaves.

  7. #7

    Default

    Definitely Rome.

    During their height of power they controlled almost the entire world that they knew of and were very rich. They also were the most powerful militarily. They could pretty much crush any enemy at will. All of those other powers couldn't really trash all of their enemies.

  8. #8
    Member Member Portuguese Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,401

    Default

    Rome is interesting, given all the time they lasted, but i do not think i would label it the most golden. After all, they only had europe, a piece of africa and Asia around the mediterranium.
    Legacy for the airwaves.

  9. #9

    Default

    Yeah but they had more land than most of the others had, plus they fought against tough armies to do it. The Spanish Empire involved shooting down guys that were still in the Dark Ages militarily.

  10. #10
    Member Member komninos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    752

    Default

    Hi all,

    I have voted for home … for obvious reasons.

    Some things to note though … there are several great empires missing from this lot that where more than a powerful nation at their time to name a few, the Assyrians, Babylonians, Sumerians and lets not forget the Persian Empire. These sine bright not only for their power but also there Art and Knowledge. There are also some that are not there but they are dark … the Mongolian Golden Horde is one of them.

    Now I would have separated the Hellenic from the Hellenistic Periods. They had different values and aspects. If they were not joined I would have voted for the Hellenic Golden Age in the 5th Century. The reason is that they set the basis for most of the sciences we have today, the reached unprecedented levels in literature, art, and philosophy. They also managed to give the light to several other civilizations with out ever being aggressive to them. Some of the greatest cities in the Mediterranean area originated from colonies they built.
    On the military front they took up arms against the largest empire of the time only to be victorious in battles that were outnumbered by 1 to 10.
    The Roman civilization copied and continued it to transport it to the Celtic and Germanic tribes while Alexander and its successor kingdoms transported it to the east and only missed the Chinese civilization by 10 years.

  11. #11
    Master of the Horse Senior Member Pindar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The base of Yggdrasil
    Posts
    3,710

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] ]there are several great empires missing from this lot that where more than a powerful nation at their time to name a few, the Assyrians, Babylonians, Sumerians and lets not forget the Persian Empire.
    Alas, there are only ten possible slots that one can use when making a poll. Choices had to be made. There certainly are many interesting nations that could have been chosen. This also applies to Portugal, The Netherlands, and Sweden, Japan etc.. I tried to allow for those nations/empires that combinded a real economic/cultural/military clout and left an international wake.


    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] ]Now I would have separated the Hellenic from the Hellenistic Periods.
    The reason I merged Greece and the Macedonians together was, that while the Macedonians were a distinct people, they were nonetheless part of the Greek cultural sphere. For example: Philips phalanx had Greek roots, Aristotle was a Macedonian, and it was the conquests of Alexander that allowed Greek thought to move into the East.

    "We are lovers of beauty without extravagance and of learning without loss of vigor." -Thucydides

    "The secret of Happiness is Freedom, and the secret of Freedom, Courage." -Thucydides

  12. #12
    Member Member Portuguese Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (Hamburglar @ Sep. 29 2003,22:57)]Yeah but they had more land than most of the others had, plus they fought against tough armies to do it. The Spanish Empire involved shooting down guys that were still in the Dark Ages militarily.
    Not quite. spain at its prime was a definite Europeans power too. Later on, if the unification of the French and spanish crown was to take place the world as we know it would be totally different.

    On the other hand i just like worldwide empires, so i'm pretty suspicious

    It's really hard to compare golden ages.
    Legacy for the airwaves.

  13. #13
    Destroyer of Gauls Member bighairyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    What's that behind YOU!!!!!!
    Posts
    643

    Default

    almost every major country have their Golden ages, some have mor ethen others, i would have voted on the roman empire, way until 350AD before everything just become bad at once. the mongol empire in the 1250s. and Tang China, they creat beatifully poems and other works of lierature that are still tough in chinese schools in china. if you look at all 3, you will also find out that they 're all major military powers of their time.
    so here's my though
    military power=military domintion of an area=enconoic power=great works of art and lierature=golden age
    No poor bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making other bastards dying for their country.

    The draft is white people sending black people to fight yellow people to protect the country they stole from red people.

    why would anybody want to touch a girl's butt? Bart Sim

  14. #14

    Default

    Rome give us Rome Right now
    Lord Rom

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO