Let me Quote something from Mark Whittow's book:
A mid 6th century lawyer in Constantinople wrote this about the size of the army (so the army during Justinian's reign)
Let me now quote a part we're he tells us of the size of the army during the age of reconquest:Originally Posted by [b
Now this should prove that even the Eastern roman super power couldn't muster the enormous amount of men of theoratical 200000 or now the number of 50000-60000 you describe at Manzikert or the 100000 at Antioch (which was about 2 decades later than Constantine VII).Originally Posted by [b
Basil II did stabilise, but he also stagnated the offensive. With the decline of the eastern families through Basil, the army declined along with them. If the eastern families had remained in power and Basil would have lost, they would probaly have been alot more capable of stopping the Turks.
Basil was a soldier Emporer, but even though he meant well with taking down the families, he had set a trent for his succesors, making it too easy for them to keep the families in check and holding the army at a low profile.
Even though the families caused lots of instability and mayhem, they were also the ones that made the reconquest possible. It wasn't the emporer in Constantinople that reconquered the east, it was the military prowness of the families that granted the Byzantine empire it's revival. I think we shouldn't forget that, because they deserve all the credit.
Bookmarks