Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Big battles!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    What is the biggest battle anyone has ever had on M:TW?

    Mine was around 52,000 men, me as the Byzantines against about 60,000 Turks.

    Was wondering if it was rare to have battles this big.

  2. #2
    Merkismathr of Birka Member PseRamesses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Birka town in Svitjod. Realm of the Rus and the midnight sun.
    Posts
    1,939

    Default

    How long did that battle take? Haven´t been over 30-32.000 myself and it took around 4-5 hrs mostly on fastforward.

  3. #3
    Member Member The_Arab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3

    Default

    My 500 Turks held off 15,000 Papal soldiers in Rome. I just positioned my men on a hill, spearman in front, archers behind, calvary at the flanks and special forces in recerve (i.e. Janissary heavy) at the back. The battle lasted ages, those Pope ass lickers kept comming. My 6 units of archers was the key, i destroyed 95 % of the enemy army and only lost 102.
    What does not kill us, makes us stronger

  4. #4
    Merkismathr of Birka Member PseRamesses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Birka town in Svitjod. Realm of the Rus and the midnight sun.
    Posts
    1,939

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (The_Arab @ April 10 2004,04:11)]My 500 Turks held off 15,000 Papal soldiers in Rome. I just positioned my men on a hill, spearman in front, archers behind, calvary at the flanks and special forces in recerve (i.e. Janissary heavy) at the back. The battle lasted ages, those Pope ass lickers kept comming. My 6 units of archers was the key, i destroyed 95 % of the enemy army and only lost 102.
    ...so you played with unlimited ammo?

  5. #5
    Member Member Lord Ovaat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    919

    Default

    My 40,000+ Turks against almost 70,000 Mongols in Khazar, 1231. Yeah, I knew they were coming. Took most of the night to resolve the conflict. Great Of course I won. What did you think?
    Our greatest glory lies not in never having fallen, but in rising every time we fall. Oliver Goldsmith

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (PseRamesses @ April 10 2004,03:33)]How long did that battle take? Haven´t been over 30-32.000 myself and it took around 4-5 hrs mostly on fastforward.
    I just Auto-resolved, I can't stand battles where reinforcments keep appearing just when you think you've won.

  7. #7
    Member Member Duke Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (Copperhead @ April 10 2004,11:06)]I just Auto-resolved, I can't stand battles where reinforcments keep appearing just when you think you've won.
    i only auto resolve on stupid battles, like when they have less than 50 men, and i have around 500. i try not to autoresolve battles, cuz i enjoy the experience, especially watching their general being hunted down when he tries to retreat. never had more than a 1000 troops in my battles, but i did once fight 900vs3200 and won. No dachi samurai rule
    "You know me, Marge. I like my beer cold, my TV loud, and my homosexuals fa-laming!" -Homer

  8. #8

    Default

    I like to have big battles as long as it isn't rediculous. Up to 3000 men is my limit then i auto-resolve cus it takes to long to play the battles.

  9. #9
    Ceasar Member octavian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Burlington ON
    Posts
    1,575

    Default

    bigest battle? probably my 14,000 against an enemy 33,000 which i won. took about three hours though, and with odds like that, auto-calc is not an option
    60+ new units – including the mighty Indian War Elephants, Persian immortals and Indian naked female archers.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Senior Member katank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA, USA
    Posts
    3,739

    Default

    precisely

    I don't see how Copperhead's policy works against the Mongols when you start a high game as Russians, Byz, or the Turks.

  11. #11

    Default

    I have never done a campaign in high perios or late period. I prefer to play it all the way through. So i wouldn't know whether it is suitable or not.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Senior Member katank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA, USA
    Posts
    3,739

    Default

    autocalcing against mongols when starting in early is possible to win but from high, it's not at all viable.

    autocalc ignores bridge battles which for missile heavy full of pav arb armies could easily take out the entire horde whereas autocalc would show horrible losses and defeat.

  13. #13

    Default

    Oh right. If I ever play a campaign high or late period i will take that into account.

  14. #14

    Default

    Biggest for me, so far, is my 6000+ against Mongols 18000. That one took me about 3hrs to play. It would have taken longer, but for some reason, towards the end, the enemy units kept walking in and all getting stuck in the same spot. They wouldn't move at all after that, and despite the fact I could hear them shooting arrows, no arrows left the square.

    After 2.5hrs, I wasn't about to restart it to make it fair, so I just mowed 'em down.

    Bh

  15. #15
    Resident Spammer Member son of spam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    right behind you
    Posts
    836

    Default

    I have a random question about autocalcing though. Does it take into account the multiple HP of kings/princes?

  16. #16
    Member Member Leo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Vienna
    Posts
    88

    Default

    I once lost some 200 men and the battle when I autocalcd an assault on a castle defended only by the danish king. So I think yes, it takes it into account.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Senior Member katank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA, USA
    Posts
    3,739

    Default

    I don't know about that.

    VI is very good at giving more casualties when assaulting.

    RKs are overrated by autocalc greatly and all cav are somwhat overrated in autocalc.

    jedi effect is little seen though as numerically superior armies always tends to win provided they aren't too much outteched.

  18. #18
    Member Member WorkNeglecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [b
    Quote[/b] (Bhruic @ April 11 2004,08:53)]Biggest for me, so far, is my 6000+ against Mongols 18000. That one took me about 3hrs to play. It would have taken longer, but for some reason, towards the end, the enemy units kept walking in and all getting stuck in the same spot. They wouldn't move at all after that, and despite the fact I could hear them shooting arrows, no arrows left the square.

    After 2.5hrs, I wasn't about to restart it to make it fair, so I just mowed 'em down.

    Bh
    I saw that bug too, the 2nd campaign I played. Except that it happened after about 8 hours of battle against the horde. I surrounded the box and captured thousands of routing dudes. more than 200,000 in ransom. But I haven't see it happen since I patched to 1.1.

  19. #19
    Resident Spammer Member son of spam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    right behind you
    Posts
    836

    Default

    Well, this is nowhere near you guy's big battles, but it is really funny.

    When I was playing as the Germans/medmod/hard/early, I conquered all the way to Volyhynia and the next turn took Kiev from the rebels (I suppose the Russians got killed).

    The next turn this message pops up: Kiev Invaded by Rebels Enemy: 8900 You: 1000.

    Hilarious. It was a bridge battle, but I still lost, becuase I was finally overwhelmed by the huge number of spears/woodsmen with some archers and polish retainers (they went rebel due to me killing polish king) thrown in. Even better, this was way before the Golden Horde arrived (it was around 1120), so I could only assume the the rebels built up their huge army from some really huge civil wars. It was crazy. Even worse, the rebels actually had more men in the steppes beyond . lol, this time I might actually lose to the rebels.

    Maybe I should type in .conan.

  20. #20
    Jillian & Allison's Daddy Senior Member Don Corleone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    7,588

    Default

    At the risk of sounding ignorant, what does '.conan' do? Is there an earthshattering 'kabooom'?
    "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."
    Don Vito Corleone: The Godfather, Part 1.

    "Then wait for them and swear to God in heaven that if they spew that bull to you or your family again you will cave there heads in with a sledgehammer"
    Strike for the South

  21. #21
    Senior Member Senior Member katank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA, USA
    Posts
    3,739

    Default

    it makes you the rebel faction.

    therefore, if rebels are all powerful, .conan. will solve your woes.

    if you can't beat em, join em

  22. #22
    Keeper of Glyphs Member [DnC]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands, Flevoland, Lelystad
    Posts
    561

    Default

    Can't really remember my biggest battle, but today I had a little skirmish as the Germans against the Italians which numbered: German forces - 3675 men and Italian forces - 13980 men. It was a pretty big battle versus the Italians because (yeah yeah modded my game to huge size settings and did some other tweaking to promote large armies - and powerful ones aswell) the Mongols usually come in such large forces and above all in this scenario the Italians only had Venice, Sicily (these first two were the most profitable provinces, the rest are not all that valuable), Tuscany, Provence, Genoa, Rhodes, Crete, Milan, Sardinia and Corsica. And not to forget the fact that they probably had twice the number of men then those that fought in the battle in total I slaughtered around 8100 men and lost 1100. Those massive number of Italian Infantry, Arbalesters, Handgunners and other less numerous units just wouldn't flee untill having been cut down to about 20-40 men from 200 (It.Inf. as example) despite that their 5 star General had died a long time ago very early in the battle. This battle lasted a lot longer then I anticipated and it was a very bloody one.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO