Quote Originally Posted by Michael the Brave
Ahh,someone finally understood what I tried to say...heh,sorry,it was kinda late at night when I posted this and didn't fully realise that by saying 'hate' I could spark off such reactions...
By "hate",I've meant that I disagree with the people that seem to talk all day about tiny historical unaccuracies,while they ignore the striking fact that babysitting 16 units on the battlefield is tottaly unrealistic.
They should do everything they can to help aid the player and micromanaging,as this game STILL is (altough many would disagree) a CLICKFEST.
I just expressed my view that the way to go would be to improve the AI capabilities to help and control player's units - and yes the player should still be able to control all of his units at any time,while giving the AI controlled units some general advice on what to do when engaging the enemy.
I hope that I've clearded that up now....so,now do you people GET IT ...??
sorry, I was having a bad day

you're right that there are other ways to do it, and yea - disagree is a better word