User reviews are infinitely much more indicative of how the game really is.
It is fairly easy to root out the biased user opinions (For or Against) the game. You just have to filter the good, honest review.
Gamers play the game because they wanted to while professional reviews aren't always that way.
The PC Gamer basically said: diplomacy is "robust" but the diplomatic AI is "wonky", then the game is now more "accesible" so it is "easy to play" (with a "robust" diplomacy??).
![]()
Bookmarks