Org Mobile Site
Thread: Next Totalwar Is...
Well aparantley in some magazines and vids i seen, CA plan on making a next totalwar but they are still debating the Napolionic era, American History, or maybe a Medieval 2, they say they havent made their minds up yet but we all know they have 
as they decided on RTW before Medieval was even made, i dont cant see how any of the gunpowder era games are gonna work in this engine. also that other game IMPERIAL GLORY is being realsed soon.
Me thinks we should all get our Shogun or Medieval 2 Demands in
as they decided on RTW before Medieval was even made, i dont cant see how any of the gunpowder era games are gonna work in this engine. also that other game IMPERIAL GLORY is being realsed soon.Me thinks we should all get our Shogun or Medieval 2 Demands in
MTW2 would ROCK. I think the medieval setting is the best for TW games since you've got such a wide variety of cool units and cultures. If they really wanted to be ambitious they could increase the scale of the conflict from europe/middle east to everything between europe and japan. But I'd be more than ok with just the same area as MTW redone with all the new engine improvements.
I don't see why they couldn't alter the engine to make it work properly for gun based warfare. Map size would need to be huge.
I agree the medieval period is the best setting for a TW game . The technical advances for example runs from iron mail armour right trough to full plate steal then there's the introdction of the crossbow and its development into a long range armour weapon. fortifacations start as mere earth works and timber baracades to massive stone fortresess and the development of siege engines used to breach them with the eventual introduction of gun powder.All this set on the back ground of the medieval power struggle wich resulted in hundreds of years of warfare. I cant think of a period more suited to a TW game .
I say they make Shogun 2 and Medieval 2 with rpg elements that would make me happy heh
CA in the Gamespot interviews talk about always developing two games, one an evolution and the other a revolution. So MTW was a evolution of STW, whilst RTW is a revolution - by this I think they mean the revolution was going from 2D to 3D for battles, and the tight integration of the strategic campaign map with the tactical battle maps.
An evolution of RTW may be STW 2 or MTW 2 with the new engine. Or possibly some other era, but still using the same engine. After all they have invested a lot in the engine, and it has light years of mileage in it, as can be seen already with all the TV spin offs.
But what would be the revolution from RTW? They've already done the 3D thing, and I don't think just improving the graphics will cut the mustard - we can take it as read that future games will always have better graphics.
What about improving the strategy elements? There is more scope for revolutionary changes here, but we need to see first how much RTW has already achieved, and what scope remains for future developments.
I think the obvious candidate, and the one big area of weakness in Total War games, is multiplayer, and I mean campaign/strategic, and well as battles. Campaign MP is a problem that has yet to be solved, but there is a very large market for massive, immersive MP games. You would be an up and coming general in the Total War universe, pitching your wits against human opponents to conquer the known world.
An evolution of RTW may be STW 2 or MTW 2 with the new engine. Or possibly some other era, but still using the same engine. After all they have invested a lot in the engine, and it has light years of mileage in it, as can be seen already with all the TV spin offs.
But what would be the revolution from RTW? They've already done the 3D thing, and I don't think just improving the graphics will cut the mustard - we can take it as read that future games will always have better graphics.
What about improving the strategy elements? There is more scope for revolutionary changes here, but we need to see first how much RTW has already achieved, and what scope remains for future developments.
I think the obvious candidate, and the one big area of weakness in Total War games, is multiplayer, and I mean campaign/strategic, and well as battles. Campaign MP is a problem that has yet to be solved, but there is a very large market for massive, immersive MP games. You would be an up and coming general in the Total War universe, pitching your wits against human opponents to conquer the known world.
Three Kingdoms: Total War!
Hopefully...
I'm kinda hoping CA wouldn't cover the same ground with the next total war. Why play Medieval again (even with better graphics?). With Three Kingdoms they could probably even give the hero system more meaning than just a bunch of high valor/high command guys.
Hopefully...
I'm kinda hoping CA wouldn't cover the same ground with the next total war. Why play Medieval again (even with better graphics?). With Three Kingdoms they could probably even give the hero system more meaning than just a bunch of high valor/high command guys.
Another revolutionary change would be to implement proper sea based battles, rather than the current abstraction.
Again, like the campaign multi-player, this could be applied to many different eras. How about New World: Total War, set in the age of European expansion and colonisation of America, Africa, and Australasia. A lot of the decisive battles occurred at sea, which would be ideal for a new engine. If you have read any of the Patrick O'Brian books - or seen the film Master and Commander, you will know what I mean.
Again, like the campaign multi-player, this could be applied to many different eras. How about New World: Total War, set in the age of European expansion and colonisation of America, Africa, and Australasia. A lot of the decisive battles occurred at sea, which would be ideal for a new engine. If you have read any of the Patrick O'Brian books - or seen the film Master and Commander, you will know what I mean.
I'm going for Napoleonic: Total War.
We already have Medieval, so I really don't think we need another one (how different could it be?). Shogun 2 would be better, simply because Shogun is older than Medieval. The change from Shugun to the next game would be huge. The reason I want N:TW is because it hasn't been done. There has never been a TW game in which the main weapon was the gun. It would be something completely different.
Thats my 2 cents.
We already have Medieval, so I really don't think we need another one (how different could it be?). Shogun 2 would be better, simply because Shogun is older than Medieval. The change from Shugun to the next game would be huge. The reason I want N:TW is because it hasn't been done. There has never been a TW game in which the main weapon was the gun. It would be something completely different.
Thats my 2 cents.
I'm for a Napoleonic total war as well. Intsead of shogun 2 I'd prefer an asian total war set from persia in the west to japan in the east from the begining of the sung dynasty till the fall of the ming, that would work great. Personally Medieval 2 is the last thing I hope they make, a rehash of medieval with rome's engine would just be a worthless cop out IMO.
Originally Posted by lars573:
I'm for a Napoleonic total war as well. Intsead of shogun 2 I'd prefer an asian total war set from persia in the west to japan in the east from the begining of the sung dynasty till the fall of the ming, that would work great. Personally Medieval 2 is the last thing I hope they make, a rehash of medieval with rome's engine would just be a worthless cop out IMO.
I'm for a Napoleonic total war as well. Intsead of shogun 2 I'd prefer an asian total war set from persia in the west to japan in the east from the begining of the sung dynasty till the fall of the ming, that would work great. Personally Medieval 2 is the last thing I hope they make, a rehash of medieval with rome's engine would just be a worthless cop out IMO.
that would be unbelievably massive in scope and would not capture the interests of enough buyers - however interesting it is
a 3 kingdoms or dynastic china-Japan game is a possibility with maybe a eurasian steppe/South asia mod or something
but my bet is on napoleonic TW next - or at least it will be the Revolution game
It's tough for game companies to find something which people will like after breaking ground with new ideas - now they've covered most of the time periods so they'll have ot pull something really good out of their hats this time.
I was always of the opinion that the MTW map should have been extended all the way to Japan, thus covering the same territory/factions as the old Koei game Ghengis Khan II. So that's what I'd like to see for a MTW2.
But then again, Rome is my dream game, so it matters little what they make next as long as the expansion(s) for RTW are good.
But then again, Rome is my dream game, so it matters little what they make next as long as the expansion(s) for RTW are good.
I cant see how a gun based game would be as fun or as skillful as hand to hand infantry. If your going to have a gun based game you may as well go the hole hogg and have WWII TW........ No thanks.
MTW 2 would be my preference.
Another interesting setting would be to decrease the scope of the game, allowing for more detail.
A game about the War of the Roses perhaps, with very detailed dynastic/political aspects.
Another interesting setting would be to decrease the scope of the game, allowing for more detail.
A game about the War of the Roses perhaps, with very detailed dynastic/political aspects.
A 1453-1815 era game would be a good guess for their revolution game. Even up until 1815 cavalry still were significant for those who like their fighting to be more up close and personal (just ask the scot greys at waterloo), as were bayonet charges and the like.
I don't see why people are so opposed to MTW2, especially if it covered a larger area. It would be a far different game from MTW1 with the rome engine, heavy cavalry could really make much more impressive charges as they should've, castles would be as imposing as they truely were during the period (RTW's walled cities make MTW fortresses look like sandcastles). Then you have the whole new and improved strategic map to really make that part more interesting.
I don't see why people are so opposed to MTW2, especially if it covered a larger area. It would be a far different game from MTW1 with the rome engine, heavy cavalry could really make much more impressive charges as they should've, castles would be as imposing as they truely were during the period (RTW's walled cities make MTW fortresses look like sandcastles). Then you have the whole new and improved strategic map to really make that part more interesting.
The rumors that the next TW game will indeed be Medieval '2' have made a huge impression on me. I was originally hoping that modders would transform RTW into 'Medieval 3D' but if there is any truth to this rumor then I won't have to hope and modders won't have to bother!
Although remaking Medieval right after Rome sounds strange, by the time the remake actually hits the shelves it will be sometime in late 2006/early 2007, more than 4 years after the original was released. Four years is a rather long time as far as PC gaming is concerned and the original Medieval will definitely be yesterday's news by then. Furthermore the Dark Ages/Medieval period is so damn popular I think strategy gamers and the TW community will be delighted to see CA take this route. The RTW system is so far ahead of previous TW games that Medieval '2' would seem like an entirely different beast from the original.
If CA doesn't remake Medieval than I'd definitely like to see them cover the Three Kingdoms period in China or turn back the clock even further and cover the struggles between the Hittites, Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, etc.
It is definitely looking like CA's next 'revolutionary' title will feature warfare in the early gunpowder age. I'm hoping they cover the period from the 30 years war, War of the Spanish Succession, etc... all the way to the Napoleonic wars. But I'd really like to see them cover a smaller time frame, maybe from the time of Frederick the Great to sometime after the Napoleonic Wars, so we can have monthly turns instead of bi-annual or annual turns like we do now.
Although remaking Medieval right after Rome sounds strange, by the time the remake actually hits the shelves it will be sometime in late 2006/early 2007, more than 4 years after the original was released. Four years is a rather long time as far as PC gaming is concerned and the original Medieval will definitely be yesterday's news by then. Furthermore the Dark Ages/Medieval period is so damn popular I think strategy gamers and the TW community will be delighted to see CA take this route. The RTW system is so far ahead of previous TW games that Medieval '2' would seem like an entirely different beast from the original.
If CA doesn't remake Medieval than I'd definitely like to see them cover the Three Kingdoms period in China or turn back the clock even further and cover the struggles between the Hittites, Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, etc.
It is definitely looking like CA's next 'revolutionary' title will feature warfare in the early gunpowder age. I'm hoping they cover the period from the 30 years war, War of the Spanish Succession, etc... all the way to the Napoleonic wars. But I'd really like to see them cover a smaller time frame, maybe from the time of Frederick the Great to sometime after the Napoleonic Wars, so we can have monthly turns instead of bi-annual or annual turns like we do now.
Originally Posted by :
Why play Medieval again (even with better graphics?).
Dude, I'd buy it... that and STW 2. I'll buy any thing as long as it's not a gun based one. I hate guns. Why play Medieval again (even with better graphics?).
I'd go for a MTW2 but with an earlier starting date and a world map.
The changes, however, i'm mostly interested in have to do with gameplay. I'd like to see the following:
- A real-time 3d map without "end turns" which reflects the constant changes as time passes.
- No provinces, just towns and cities and areas of influence around them.
- Several kinds of economical and political systems and the ability of the player to shift between them in the long-term.
- Different kinds of social organisation in different societies and different ways of troop recruitment for each faction, according to the faction's economical and political system.
- Even larger and more imposing 3d battles with more realistic fighting animations and a multitude of skins per unit (no more "attack of the clones"!).
- Naval battles.
I'm sure i have more to add in that list but can't think of it at the moment. Please tell me what you think.
The changes, however, i'm mostly interested in have to do with gameplay. I'd like to see the following:
- A real-time 3d map without "end turns" which reflects the constant changes as time passes.
- No provinces, just towns and cities and areas of influence around them.
- Several kinds of economical and political systems and the ability of the player to shift between them in the long-term.
- Different kinds of social organisation in different societies and different ways of troop recruitment for each faction, according to the faction's economical and political system.
- Even larger and more imposing 3d battles with more realistic fighting animations and a multitude of skins per unit (no more "attack of the clones"!).
- Naval battles.
I'm sure i have more to add in that list but can't think of it at the moment. Please tell me what you think.
I would say Medieval 2.
Napoleonic Era: Problematic -> Gunpowder units were the worst part of MTW (IMO). They would fight on new terrain with the introduction of gunpowder, while
MTW 2 -> familiar ground, plus the experiences of RTW with the new 3D engine.
Good chance that this game would not only feature one of the imo most interesting periods, but also improved gameplay free of major bugs and the gripes of a completely new game / system.
Napoleonic Era: Problematic -> Gunpowder units were the worst part of MTW (IMO). They would fight on new terrain with the introduction of gunpowder, while
MTW 2 -> familiar ground, plus the experiences of RTW with the new 3D engine.
Good chance that this game would not only feature one of the imo most interesting periods, but also improved gameplay free of major bugs and the gripes of a completely new game / system.
why not go for Ancient Total war and a period around Alexander the Great or even before??
Pyros has already beaten CA to the punch with Imperial Glory. Besides, this engine is no good when it comes to guns. And it has no 3D naval battle either.
Current Engine:
Thus, the good candidates are MTW 2 or Ancient China TW. Representation of the Medieval Age in MTW was poorly done. It is then logical to right what was awful. Add some good production value here and there to get the real medieval flavor (I'm not asking for an implementation of the feudal system here
). IMHO, Shogun was tastefully done and there's no need yet to remake this one.
Next Generation:
For the next generation of TW they should improve upon the hack-and-slash, pin-and-flank style since it is getting quite old. (IG already utilizes buildings, trees, etc for tactics).
Add some Naval Battles there. They are already behind on this one too (IG).
Twenty units is still not nearly enough!!! (Right, right???
)
Much larger battle maps so reinforcements will no longer be as necessary ( So you can make large flanking maneuver; Heck even divide your large army into 5 pieces for a truly coordinated offensive).
As for the socio-political-economic-military system. I'll wait for he verdict in RTW first. See if there is a balance there.
I'm pretty sure everyone has their own ideas on how to improve the next gen. TW.
Current Engine:
Thus, the good candidates are MTW 2 or Ancient China TW. Representation of the Medieval Age in MTW was poorly done. It is then logical to right what was awful. Add some good production value here and there to get the real medieval flavor (I'm not asking for an implementation of the feudal system here
). IMHO, Shogun was tastefully done and there's no need yet to remake this one.Next Generation:
For the next generation of TW they should improve upon the hack-and-slash, pin-and-flank style since it is getting quite old. (IG already utilizes buildings, trees, etc for tactics).
Add some Naval Battles there. They are already behind on this one too (IG).
Twenty units is still not nearly enough!!! (Right, right???
)Much larger battle maps so reinforcements will no longer be as necessary ( So you can make large flanking maneuver; Heck even divide your large army into 5 pieces for a truly coordinated offensive).
As for the socio-political-economic-military system. I'll wait for he verdict in RTW first. See if there is a balance there.
I'm pretty sure everyone has their own ideas on how to improve the next gen. TW.
Originally Posted by Ashantiwarrior:
why not go for Ancient Total war and a period around Alexander the Great or even before??
why not go for Ancient Total war and a period around Alexander the Great or even before??
that will probably be the expansion
east asia will be the evolutionary
napoleonic will be the revolutionary
thats my verdict - it sounds like it would make sense
I think there should be two expansions: One for the 'Barbarian Migrations' with the Huns and the Goths, the Other around Alexander.
I think it will be MTW 2, with a later finishing date maybe. I think this would be the one they do because due to the later finishing date, gunpowder units will be used much more, and they can use feedback from players to gauge whether a predominately gunpowder game would be successful (eg NTW). Gunpowder and primarily ranged units are something that CA have never done, so it may be a bit risky to jump straight into it.
Why not go into the future like Sid Meiers Alpha Centauri and completely make something up. They don't even have to go that far forward.
At least the historical accuracy nuts would leave them alone.
At least the historical accuracy nuts would leave them alone.
If we're straying from real history here, Westeros: Total War (based off the fantasy books by George RR Martin) would definitely make an amazing game. If not, I think Napoleonic:TW would be the next logical choice, followed by Medieval:TW 2.
Originally Posted by biguth dickuth:
I'd like to see the following:
- A real-time 3d map without "end turns" which reflects the constant changes as time passes.
Ugh no - this would make TotalWar into an RTS, which is probably anathema to most people here. I personally need time to think whilst I'm planning my next move (and I don't want to have to keep pressing pause).I'd like to see the following:
- A real-time 3d map without "end turns" which reflects the constant changes as time passes.
Originally Posted by :
- No provinces, just towns and cities and areas of influence around them.
As per RTW.- No provinces, just towns and cities and areas of influence around them.
Originally Posted by :
- Several kinds of economical and political systems and the ability of the player to shift between them in the long-term.
- Different kinds of social organisation in different societies and different ways of troop recruitment for each faction, according to the faction's economical and political system.
These will add more depth to the game, but may make it too complicated for the average player - some reviews have already complained that RTW is too complicated.- Several kinds of economical and political systems and the ability of the player to shift between them in the long-term.
- Different kinds of social organisation in different societies and different ways of troop recruitment for each faction, according to the faction's economical and political system.
Originally Posted by :
- Even larger and more imposing 3d battles with more realistic fighting animations and a multitude of skins per unit (no more "attack of the clones"!).
This will surely happen, as the power of graphic cards keeps increasing.- Even larger and more imposing 3d battles with more realistic fighting animations and a multitude of skins per unit (no more "attack of the clones"!).
Originally Posted by :
- Naval battles.
This gets my vote; it is a major area of gameplay where CA have yet to make their mark.- Naval battles.
A good reason why CA may not do Napoleaonic era next is the forthcoming release of Imperial Glory from Pyro, which looks very much like what would happen if you ported the RTW engine to Napoleonic times, and added in 3D sea battles.
However, if Imperial Glory is a lemon, then there will still be room for CA - but will they want to tread in someone else's footsteps, rather than lead the field?
From where I'm sitting, it looks like CA's options are limited. It is difficult to see how they can repeat the success of RTW, with an era that has equal mass market appeal and has not already been done. I think MTW 2 looks more likely as a result - at least CA already own this space, they know it in depth, and there is the existing MTW market plus new comers from RTW.
However, if Imperial Glory is a lemon, then there will still be room for CA - but will they want to tread in someone else's footsteps, rather than lead the field?
From where I'm sitting, it looks like CA's options are limited. It is difficult to see how they can repeat the success of RTW, with an era that has equal mass market appeal and has not already been done. I think MTW 2 looks more likely as a result - at least CA already own this space, they know it in depth, and there is the existing MTW market plus new comers from RTW.
Yeah MTW 2 would be sweet.
The Creative Assembly and Ensemble Studios tend to be having the same problems - they run out of Historical Periods to make games out of...
The Creative Assembly and Ensemble Studios tend to be having the same problems - they run out of Historical Periods to make games out of...
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO