Results 1 to 30 of 53

Thread: Unit Balancing Suggestions to CA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Morindin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    279

    Default Re: Unit Balancing Suggestions to CA

    You guys should check out the Realism Mod at TWcenter.
    It tweaks and balances a lot of the factions, units( and removes the silly ones), and names. Egypt gets a big working over being completely changed to the Ptolemaic Empire, gaining more modern Egytian units, losing ancient ones, etc.

    It also has numerous changes to the AI and includes the killspeed/run speed mods, I posted a link in the modding thread here.

    On the discussion of balance here. I think single player is a poor way to judge the balance of a unit. For example, I had problems with Scythian chosen warband archers in single player. Is the unit "warband archer" overpowered? Probably not. It could have been the Scythian temple bonus that was overpowered, and nerfing the unit may nerf it for other races.

    The best way to judge is multiplayer, if you're finding one unit there (where all things are equal) owning the battlefield in a combined arms situation (and not against its matchup) then yes it needs to be looked at. There is also the issue of histroical accuracy too, but Im no expert on that.

    There is also the other side of the fence, a lot of people get their ass handed to them by a unit and cry out "unbalanced" because they simply dont know how to handle a particular unit, or let their opponent exercise the units strengths.
    Units such as chariot archers do have a weakness, that is melee. But if you cant catch them you can never exploit their weakness, so really they dont. Playing against the AI you can trick it into being trapped in a melee (exploiting the skirmish feature), again, this is why singleplayer is a poor judge of balance. But multiplayer a human is not so stupid.
    Last edited by Morindin; 10-11-2004 at 21:39.
    Talk is cheap - Supply exceeds Demand.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Unit Balancing Suggestions to CA

    Actually, the chariot archers are strong in a melee. I get significant losses attacking them from the back.

  3. #3
    Member Member Morindin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    279

    Default Re: Unit Balancing Suggestions to CA

    Quote Originally Posted by andrewt
    Actually, the chariot archers are strong in a melee. I get significant losses attacking them from the back.
    Well there you go.
    Talk is cheap - Supply exceeds Demand.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Unit Balancing Suggestions to CA

    Ok. I'm off to find the modding thread here.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Unit Balancing Suggestions to CA

    Quote Originally Posted by andrewt
    Actually, the chariot archers are strong in a melee. I get significant losses attacking them from the back.
    I'll second that. Even my Bedouin Camels (which have bonuses in the desert, and more importantly to chariots) and 10 star general 30-50 unit cavalry take tremendous losses meleeing with Chariot Archers. They also lose just about every time they fight them one-on-one as well.
    Some fought for power. Some for glory. Others fought for much more...

    Onward men! There's juice to be had!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO