Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: The reason to take walls rather than destroy them :)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    For TosaInu and the Org Senior Member The_Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The United Kingdom of Great Britain
    Posts
    4,354

    Default Re: The reason to take walls rather than destroy them :)

    I find that the main problem with using only Sap points is that you need to blast more than one hole in the wall to be effective... Otherwise the enemy will just mob you on the other side.

    Taking the walls is the best way to minimise casualties, and Siege Towers are best for this because (unlike ladders) your men actually manage to survive long enough to get up there.
    "Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."

  2. #2
    Actual Person Member Paul Peru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Yurp
    Posts
    529

    Default Re: The reason to take walls rather than destroy them :)

    In my first real siege (beyond picket fences) I managed to get sappers under one of my siege towers
    At least it worked as one would expect; the tower collapsed.
    Until I read this tread, I hadn't figured out what to do once I was up on the wall, so I just used sappers. (or rams, if I wanted to give my legions a nice, dangerous barbeque)
    Sono Pazzi Questi Romani
    Paul Peru: Holier than thy bucket!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO