Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Ridiculous "gameplay"

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    For TosaInu and the Org Senior Member The_Emperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The United Kingdom of Great Britain
    Posts
    4,354

    Default Re: Ridiculous "gameplay"

    That's just stupid and frustrating in my opinion, ESPECIALLY due to the ridiculous suicide charging AI reinforcement generals we have in the game right now
    it is a valid tactic, and one that the player can exploit against the AI as well. if your army faces up against two armies and has the option of attacking the weaker one or the stronger one, what would you do?

    If you attack the weaker one the AI has to bring on the stronger larger army as reinforcements, this gives you the chance to destroy the smaller force before they arrive as the larger one will have to trudge across the map to get to you.

    As for "ridiculous suicide charging AI reinforcement generals", I have only ever fought one battle where the AI charged my general in ahead of my army and got him killed, so it is hardly conclusive. Just last night I had a battle where my AI force managed to get to the enemy before I could, and I was the one who was forced to come in late like reinforcements while the AI defeated the enemy on a hill...

    If you don't like the AI controlling your generals then you shouldn't give it the opportunity to do so.
    "Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it."

  2. #2

    Default Re: Ridiculous "gameplay"

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Emperor
    As for "ridiculous suicide charging AI reinforcement generals", I have only ever fought one battle where the AI charged my general in ahead of my army and got him killed, so it is hardly conclusive. Just last night I had a battle where my AI force managed to get to the enemy before I could, and I was the one who was forced to come in late like reinforcements while the AI defeated the enemy on a hill...
    You can't have played much then.

    If you don't like the AI controlling your generals then you shouldn't give it the opportunity to do so.
    I wouldn't if I could freaking help it!

  3. #3
    Bureaucratically Efficient Senior Member TinCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    13,729

    Default Re: Ridiculous "gameplay"

    Why would you ever beseige with 4 armies in the first place? Sure the system doesn't work perfectly, but you're just asking to be screwed with a setup like that. You would never be able to go through more than 1 full stack of reinforcements in a battle anyway, so why bring the other 2 and risk this scenario?


  4. #4

    Default Re: Ridiculous "gameplay"

    Just because it was Rome that I was besieging and I wanted be like ha ha **** you Romans this is what your warmongering has brought you!!!! this was the end of a long and bitter war you see. It felt good. Also silly me thought that the defenders wouldn't dare to sally against such a huge besieging army....I didn't know the game treated it as four separate armies conducting four separate sieges and that the AI could attack whichever quarter it wanted at leisure....

    still, it should give me the option to control whichever army I want.
    Last edited by GFX707; 10-14-2004 at 16:46.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO