Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Jugurtha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Ether
    Posts
    24

    Default Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

    In MTW cutting a faction's lands in two often resulted in rebellions in the half seperated from the leader, does this happen in RTW?

    I am palying the Seleucids and have just cut the parthian empire in two by taking Susa. I attacked here to provoke rebellions as the leader is stuck in the mush smaller area, I was hoping to see rebellions in the rest. There have been a few rebel armies in those lands but no massive rebellions thaat I can see.

    Apologies if this has been extensively covered elsewhere, but I can't remember seeing a definitive answer to this.

  2. #2
    Member Member Ranges's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    66

    Default Re: Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

    I havent yet seen this happen in RTW.. Would be interesting to try it though.. :)
    Crusades... They should stay medieval.

  3. #3
    Member Member fastspawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    in front of computer
    Posts
    56

    Default Re: Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

    there might be an increase in rebellion for far-flung provinces due to distance from capital, but i don't think it will be a difference from when the demesne was contiguous.

    The Gauls start of cut in two.

  4. #4
    Bland Assassin Member Zatoichi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    438

    Default Re: Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

    If you are cutting the territories in half, then by default you'll be cutting off their trade routes, which I think adds to unrest. There may be more complex calculations going on under the bonnet, it's certainly more complex than the MTW model.

  5. #5
    Member Member Jugurtha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Ether
    Posts
    24

    Default Re: Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

    It just seems to me that if a territory were cut in two it would have more immediate and far reaching political repurcussions. Low level rises in unrest because trade had been interupted would seem to be the least of it to me. Especially if the leader were on the other side of the divide.

  6. #6
    Psychotic Shock Trooper Member Excalibur Bane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Kingston, Canada
    Posts
    83

    Unhappy Re: Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

    I had a single territory of Parthians completely surrounded and cut off from it's main force for many, many turns (That idiotic province hiding in Eygpt, I didn't notice it) and no major rebelling was going on there at all, despite the fact that it was completely isolated and surrounded by hostile forces.

    A bit unrealistic IMO. In a scenario like this, the town should be considered "under siege" and apply all the appropriate penalties.
    Founder and eternal member of the UBB
    www.ubb.org

  7. #7

    Default Re: Cutting factions in 2 = rebellion?

    "In MTW cutting a faction's lands in two often resulted in rebellions in the half seperated from the leader, does this happen in RTW?"

    I don't think so. At least, I haven't had trouble as the Julii with my lands split in half :D

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO