Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

  1. #1
    Lord, Cartographer and Poet. Member King Azzole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    404

    Default Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    Last roman game I played I didnt get to use them cause the reforms happend around 240. I tried my best this time on Very Hard to develope my citys slowly except for the army barracks, balancing population growth to my barracks growth. I got the reforms this time around 220 but I still only had triarii on the battlefield around 20 turns or so. By the time you build them up and get them going into your front line armys, the reforms happen. Whats the point? I think its stupid you cant build them sooner cause it makes them kinda moot. Anyone else feel that way too?
    Charge, repeat as necessary.

  2. #2
    A Livonian Rebel Member Slaists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,828

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    yes, i think, their building requirements should be lowered (maybe, the price should be raised). or, alternatively, the reforms should happen later (different trigger?)... probably, "as is", rome is the only province where someone can build them early enough to actually field them...

  3. #3
    Swarthylicious Member Spino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,604

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    Quote Originally Posted by King Azzole
    Last roman game I played I didnt get to use them cause the reforms happend around 240. I tried my best this time on Very Hard to develope my citys slowly except for the army barracks, balancing population growth to my barracks growth. I got the reforms this time around 220 but I still only had triarii on the battlefield around 20 turns or so. By the time you build them up and get them going into your front line armys, the reforms happen. Whats the point? I think its stupid you cant build them sooner cause it makes them kinda moot. Anyone else feel that way too?
    FYI, whenever any faction completes the equivalent of an Imperial Palace the Marian reforms are triggered.

    There is a silver lining to this cloud. The devs have stated that this will be fixed in an upcoming patch by preventing the reforms from happening prior to a certain date, regardless of whether an Imperial Palace level building has been built.
    "Why spoil the beauty of the thing with legality?" - Theodore Roosevelt

    Idealism is masturbation, but unlike real masturbation idealism actually makes one blind. - Fragony

    Though Adrian did a brilliant job of defending the great man that is Hugo Chavez, I decided to post this anyway.. - JAG (who else?)

  4. #4

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    i feel you K.A. Triarii were my favorite unit of the game but i get them for about 5 turns and then they become obsolete and i can't make 'em any more.
    indeed

  5. #5
    Medical Welshman in London. Senior Member Big King Sanctaphrax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Cardiff in the summer, London during term time.
    Posts
    7,988

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    In my Scipii game, I took Carthage straight off the bat, and had access to Triarii way before the reforms.
    Co-Lord of BKS and Beirut's Kingdom of Peace and Love.

    "Handsome features, rugged exteriors, intellectual chick magnets, we're pretty much twins."-Beirut

    "Rhy, where's your helicopter now? Where's your ******* helicopter now?"-Mephistopheles.



  6. #6
    Member Member Plantagenet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Westminster Palace
    Posts
    271

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    I just made my faction the only ones able to build the Imperial Palace.

    Once I've gotten to break in my triarii a bit and feel ready, I build it and trigger the reforms. Then I re-edit the file to allow everyone else to build it too.
    My ancestors came with William the Bastard and won their lands by the sword, and with the sword I will hold them against all comers.
    -Earl John de Warenne of Surrey

  7. #7
    Lord, Cartographer and Poet. Member King Azzole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    404

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    Quote Originally Posted by Spino
    FYI, whenever any faction completes the equivalent of an Imperial Palace the Marian reforms are triggered.

    There is a silver lining to this cloud. The devs have stated that this will be fixed in an upcoming patch by preventing the reforms from happening prior to a certain date, regardless of whether an Imperial Palace level building has been built.

    Thanks Spino thats very useful info!
    Charge, repeat as necessary.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    I'd prefer to see retraining being the mechanism for maniple advancement, as this would reflect the age advancement from young limber Velites to wiry veteran Triarii.

    Thus:
    Retrained Velites become Hastati.
    Retrained Hastati become Principes.
    Retrained Principes become Triarii.

    Failing that, swapping the Principes build option to the Army Barracks in return for moving the Triarii option at the Legion Barracks would better suit the historical shift Rome made from greek-like spear armies to legionari swordsmen. That said I can't remember exactly when the Roman 2nd Line swapped their thrusting spears for pilum, by the time the RTW campaign starts they may already be pilum equipped.
    Don't shoot me - I'm just the texture artist.

  9. #9
    (Insert innuendo here) Member Balloon Bomber Champion DemonArchangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Washington D.C
    Posts
    3,277

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    Hoplite Phalanx was gone by 390b.c
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    China is not a world power. China is the world, and it's surrounded by a ring of tiny and short-lived civilisations like the Americas, Europeans, Mongols, Moghuls, Indians, Franks, Romans, Japanese, Koreans.

  10. #10
    Member Member Szun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    66

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    I noticed that rome triggers marius too unless u play very hard campaign.
    Also Rome seems to get a portion of every "enslave populaton", wich makes rome the most growing city even with negative 5% growth.
    I had marius in 251 once wich was pre princps for me wich was kinda silly...

    If u play julii hastati are all u need + equites +archers
    easy to retrain in the low pop towns in gaul

  11. #11

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    Maybe they should give you a few years after building the Imperial Palace before the Marian reforms are triggerred. Maybe 5-10. I still like the idea of the player affecting when the Marian reforms are triggered.

  12. #12
    Oni Member Samurai Waki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Portland, Ore.
    Posts
    3,925
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    My biggest problem with Triarii is that Cavalry seem to roll over them every time and its pissing me off, I thought they were a spearman unit...besides that my Brutii campaign went smoothly as well as soon as Athens is taken Triarii as well as a menagerie of other more advanced troops become available there.

  13. #13
    Lord, Cartographer and Poet. Member King Azzole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    404

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    I prefer a hard date marian reform. I liked the old compass etc announcements in MTW, I wish it was the same for RTW. Marion reform set sayyyy 150 bc give or take 20 years for randomness. Its not like the Romans dont pwn without the damn legions anyway.
    Charge, repeat as necessary.

  14. #14
    Member Member afrit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    321

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    actually I hope they don't move the Marius reforms to a fixed date, and if they do, it should not be too late. I finished both campaigns I played around 220 BC. WIth a date like 170BC, I'll never see legionnaires.

    That was one of my main issues with MTW. You never get to play with the high/late units much if you started on early
    The plural of anectode is not data - Anonymous Scientist

    I don't believe in superstition. It brings bad luck. - Umberto Eco

  15. #15
    Cynic Senior Member sapi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,970

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    In mtw i got to use the high units, but not the late, and i see your point.

    One option would be to switch the reform trigger to when ROME got an imperial palace, as this would be more historically accurate and would let you use triarii for a bit longer.
    From wise men, O Lord, protect us -anon
    The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions, a statistic -Stalin
    We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area -UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer

  16. #16
    Lord, Cartographer and Poet. Member King Azzole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    404

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    Not really.. They got it pretty quick in the games I played.

    How about allowing it to NOT be hardcoded? So we can edit the files accordingly and change the date ourselves according to our tastes?
    Charge, repeat as necessary.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    The reason I like it to be determined by the player and not hard-coded is that too early/too late depends on your playstyle. Some people play fast and some people take their time. I take my time playing each turn. I end up taking a lot of real time playing the game but don't necessarily have that many turns. I finished my Rome campaign around 170 B.C. and that's with a lot of screwing up trying to figure stuff.

    I agree with Afrit. If the Marian reforms happen closer to when it historically happened (even a century off), I'll never see it.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Senior Member Oaty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    2,863

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    For a short campaign the imperial palace should be the trigger but for an imperial campaign it should be set different.
    When a fox kills your chickens, do you kill the pigs for seeing what happened? No you go out and hunt the fox.
    Cry havoc and let slip the HOGS of war

  19. #19
    A Livonian Rebel Member Slaists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,828

    Default Re: Triarii = pointless? (no pun intended)

    hey, just captured carthage as ordered by the senate (playing julii) and, voila, triarii can be built there... it is 255 BC. i guess carthage starts as a very large city so the prerequisites are there.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO