Seriously, who's decision was it to release this game? If they even playtested this thing for a WEEK they'd have half of the bugs everyone's complaining about removed. This game is a joke as it is right now in single player mode. If they expect people to pay $50 for a new game, they'd better damn well make the effort to release a product that isn't RIDDLED with bugs that make the game UNPLAYABLE.
You might as well say "Hey, we're releasing the game now, but expect about 50 patches after it comes out to actually "finish" the game, which we failed to do before releasing it". "And oh yeah, here's a nice big bottle of KY, you're going to need it."
I don't even want to start listing all of the stupid things wrong with this game because anyone that's played it for a few days could tell you inumerable problems with it. My only real question now is how long did the friggin pc game review magazines play it for? There are seriously crippling bugs in this game and I have no idea how anyone could enjoy it after your population is over 25,000 at any city.
Whoever was in charge of the AI in this game should be taken out back and shot. The pathing of your troops is pathetic in a siege. Some of the most BASIC things that should be right with the game are horribly fouled. I can't even begin to imagine the kind of balls it takes to release a game filled with this many bugs. Thank god for Bittorrent.
Bookmarks