I have to agree with Capo, I usually exterminate to teach the faction a lesson. The Scippii took one of my cities (as Macedon) so when I took it back, I let them live but the first Scipii city, I killed them all.
I have to agree with Capo, I usually exterminate to teach the faction a lesson. The Scippii took one of my cities (as Macedon) so when I took it back, I let them live but the first Scipii city, I killed them all.
The web of domination has become the web of Reason itself, and this society is fatally entangled in it
I does also depends with which faction I play, because some have a dire need of manpower, like the Germans and Gauls, while others, like the Eggies have almost too much of it...
So I usually enslave always with the Gauls while I do it less when playing the Eggies, although I also orientate myself according the distance from the capital, their population, my manpower, their culture erc...
OA
Cicero, Pro Milone"Silent enim leges inter arma - For among arms, the laws fall mute"
I agree with the poster above. It depends on your needs, I used to be a softtouch but I now either enslave them or exterminate them. I don't have problems with extermination, it is a game and it gives me cash ;)
I noticed in a campaign as Scipii where I controlled the whole of Africa that Alexandria, Carthage and Memphis kept on rioting. I tried to maintain population but after loosing Carthage for the third time I decided I was fed up and killed them all, I let Alexandria and Memphis fall (maintain a tiny garrison, move your mainarmy outside the city) and retook both cities to exterminate the populace to show I was fed up with them. As a result my overall happiness went up in all states.
Leaver Dea as Sleaf!
Yeah - it's a bit off that it's necessary, but the only alternative is to produce more troops in the towns than the pop grows, and that is impossible in the long run.
Nope - no sig what so ever.
Bookmarks