Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Faction roleplaying....

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    That sounds kinda fun but hard also.

    If only for the fact that you'd only end up with faction leadres over the age of 50. Which I don't like.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member The Scourge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 1999
    Location
    London.
    Posts
    1,182

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. taxi
    That sounds kinda fun but hard also.

    If only for the fact that you'd only end up with faction leadres over the age of 50. Which I don't like.
    Well he is a faction leader(Politician.).Not a King.
    So I would have thought that experience should play a big part in who gets to lead the faction.
    That's it.

  3. #3
    Ricardus Insanusaum Member Bob the Insane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,911

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    Quote Originally Posted by The Scourge
    Well he is a faction leader(Politician.).Not a King.
    So I would have thought that experience should play a big part in who gets to lead the faction.
    Game is not just about the Romans....

    But I agree, it is not Medieval/Feudal either..

    but it is fun...

  4. #4

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    To be honest, I don't have seen the point of having a good faction leader. While the king was paramount in MTW, and could hold the whole future of the country on his vice, vertues and abilities, in RTW the faction leader doesn't seem to affect the faction in any serious way. Moreover, the micromanagement of big families, and the need to constantly ship them from the capital to cities, is incredibly tedious. And anyway, despite being big, the family doesn't hold, by far, enough people to administrate the whole empire.

    As such, I finished by completely neglecting my family, letting the computer chose whatever heir and leader it wants, and only using faction member as generals.
    If violence didn't solve your problem... well, you just haven't been violent enough.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    I have to agree, I don't find it terribly useful to have a "good" faction leader. Every family member regenerates units now, so the "King" effect of MTW isn't as useful. And it is incredibly easy to train up a military commander, so there seems to be no reason to pick a good general as faction leader.

    At this point, I just set the youngest member of my family as "heir", just so I don't have the leader dying often. I generally don't care about his stats.

    Bh

  6. #6
    Research Shinobi Senior Member Tamur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    #2 Bagshot Row
    Posts
    2,676

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    I don't spend much time picking the next faction leader -- I generally just let the game stipulate who that will be.

    Rather, I spend a lot of time "role-playing" a faction strategy based on the current leader's traits and retinue. For example, if a new faction leader has had high influence and a couple of "Foreign Tastes" sorts of vices, I roleplay the entire faction as diplomacy-only marshmallow who try to expand via negotiation against rebels and factions every other faction hates, and who will sell a city rather than defend it. etc etc. With maybe a rebel family member who's got high command and just wants to smash the other faction.

    Makes for some amusing moments!
    "Die Wahrheit ruht in Gott / Uns bleibt das Forschen." Johann von Müller

  7. #7
    Member Member Braccius Augustus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    25

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    Romans were always weary of dynasties and much of the time political heirs were not the oldest son. Leaders usually picked the most skilled or otherwise suitable person to succeed themselves.
    "Read over and over again the campaigns of Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, Gustavus, Turenne, Eugene and Frederic. ... This is the only way to become a great general and master the secrets of the art of war. ..."
    -- Napoleon Bonaparte

  8. #8
    'Alea Iacta Est' Member Modus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Legio XXII under Gaius the Wrathful, border fort West of Patavium
    Posts
    35

    Default Re: Faction roleplaying....

    As I was reading today, Gaius Julius Caeser was of the house of Julii, as was his uncle by marriage, Gaius Marius, of 'Marian Reform' fame. Caeser, was, for all intents and purposes, the heir to the mantle of responsibility that Marius caried.

    Marius, had (and this is where I'm tieing into Rome: Total War) married into the house of Julii from the Plebian class and was quite the popular politician as an outspoken advocate of Plebian concerns. His reputation was solidified through his extensive campaigns in Numidia, against the Germanic tribes of the Teutones, and the Cimbri in 101BC on the field of battle at Vercellae, this all before Roman Troops first marched on the city of Rome under the command of Lucius Cornelius Sulla when Marius, with the aid of the Tribune Sulpicius Rufus, had the Senate's selection of Sulla to be the commander of the armies raised to fight Pontus disqualified in 88 BC... Marius escapes to Africa, Sulla goes on campaign, Marius returns in 87 BC and has Sulla's supporters murdered, Marius dies in 86 BC in his 7th term as Consul.

    [ Warriors of Rome by Michael Simkins, ISBN 0 7137 2001 8 (hardback), pages 40-41 ]

    Ah, history. You think this simulation is a poor representation in the family tree department? I beg to disagree, I think it is rather appropriate, if not less involved than it should be. I'm enjoying it tremendously!
    - Modus -
    Ich dien

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO