Ok then


The roman art usually , at difference with the greeks made more realistic traits on their statues and less idealistic , even if used the same style , the nudity wasn't a shame to those culture as well as for many others at the time so nudity was also a part of the art system , tough many historical characters are depicted all but nude , so is the same for important foes that were depicted exactly how they were described to the authors , to show the public who was beaten .... in the case of the statue that is a copy of an original greek one , and even if Greeks appreciated to make nude rapresentations of heroes and gods , this is not the case since is not a hero and not a God , is a defeated enemy , plus this statue copy was in the Garden of a Roman historian so probably not just for eye candy ....