Unit Screenshots

**radcan** · 12-22-2004, 18:08

Why dont u make a fat celt for once im sure there must of been fat/large if i want to be politically correct , celts im sure they wid of been clet or british though i dont thin the germans wood
of.

**The Blind King of Bohemia** · 12-22-2004, 19:20

The Celtic warrior would have been tall muscular individuals and one for one a celt would outmatch a legionary, even roman writers would admit to this. The statue of the celt put much fear into the much smaller roman but they used other techniques in order to solve this problem with better organisation and cohesive tactics to enable victory.

**PROMETHEUS** · 12-22-2004, 19:25

Legends that pass in the mouths of the ones who didn't were testimones in perosns , The celtys were higer yes nut the avarage legionary was a bit more than one meter and 70 cms , the 1.70 was the entry levelk to be in the legion , while the Celts reached even 1.80 but not much more , the germans instead reached higer ranges even 1.85 at the best ....

**DemonArchangel** · 12-23-2004, 01:02

Err... no... 1 Roman foot is shorter than 1 modern foot.

The avg. legionary was apt to be something like 5'3 while your avg. celt was like 6 ft.

**PROMETHEUS** · 12-23-2004, 01:58

No you are wrong the Roman standards to accept people in the legion is that they had not to be shorter than 1.70 cms

anyway here is the Lybian spearmen need to know how it looks now...