Perusing thru my uni library I came across a book about Byzantium's 7th cent. Best thing about it was Heraclius' Persian campaigns.
Anyone reading it will not believe how such a general could be omitted from the ranks of some of the best generals in history. Granted I am biased, but justified.
Stupidity on the part of military "experts" who omit Heraclius because of the Arabs commit the cardinal sin of associating one relevant event to the other. What did the Muslim Arabs have to the war? Nothing in the duration of war but after it. It is the duration of the war that is the focus not after it.
This is my late night rant. I hope I will finish it when my eyesight blurs out in tiredness.
Author:
A.N. Strathos
Byzantium in the Seventh Century Book I 602-634
Heraclius tidbits:
Surrounded by 3 armies in the mountainous Zagros range and defeated all armies to extricate itself- only Hannnibal, Caesar and Alexander could do that - why not Heraclius who did?
Heraclius campaigned deep in Persia while maintaing long lines of communication against Persian armies still loose. eg. Army of Shahbaraz, he who conquered Cilicia, Syria, Roman Palestina, Armenia, Mesopotamia and Egypt.
Led from the front at all times especially in Mard U Mard (one on one combat before commencement of fighting)
Drove deep into Persian hearlland and chase Chosroe like a piggy tailed school being chased by the big bad wolf. Burnt the fellas seasonal capital Dastagard.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bookmarks