Results 1 to 30 of 46

Thread: Historical usefulness of swordsmen

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #2
    FieldMarshall Boudine of Wales Member Rayaleh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: Historical usefulness of swordsmen

    Well, imo, and I did say IMO.....

    I would think that once the melee's started, and the charges are over, Swordsmen should be abled to mess up most cavalrys. (*Duck against cavalryman slash, cut the horse, kill the dude who has just falled). And they can mess up spearmen and even pikemen (I think there were even Spanish units with swords and bucklers that use to duck, roll, and then get passed the pikes/spears or whatever, and then do immense damage).....They're relatively fast.

    I wouldn't base my army on them though, more like reinforcements/or ambushes (in some occasions), or let them in the melee once it is started they'd do good damage....Basically, shock troops, not regulars.




    But don't trust me, I'm very new.
    Last edited by Gregoshi; 10-29-2004 at 16:27. Reason: Watch the language please.
    I have issues, angry issues.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO