Results 1 to 30 of 34

Thread: Siege Engine mercenaries

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Wandering Historian Member eadingas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Llanfairpwll- gwyngyll- gogerych- wyrndrobwll- llantysilio- gogogoch
    Posts
    4,714

    Default Re: Siege Engine mercenaries

    Add the bricoli! Add the bricoli! :DD
    I'm still not here

  2. #2
    Dungalloigh Brehonda Member Ranika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,416

    Default Re: Siege Engine mercenaries

    I agree with eadingas, I think the bricoli should be added. While the account of the Chwythstúag on the Isle of Man is exaggerated or simply untrue, it seems highly unlogical that the device was simply imagined. However, it was described as firing only one bolt, and was operated by two men. But the rest of it seems to be the same (a log, with a hole hollowed through it, a bolt inserted, and a board that would spring up, slam into the end of it, and fire it). Is the bricoli from this period a multi-bolt launching system, or only a single bolt, maybe like the scorpion (which is what the Chwythstúag seems to be)?
    Ní dheachaigh fial ariamh go hIfreann.


  3. #3
    Wandering Historian Member eadingas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Llanfairpwll- gwyngyll- gogerych- wyrndrobwll- llantysilio- gogogoch
    Posts
    4,714

    Default Re: Siege Engine mercenaries

    The multi-bolt one on the picture is definitely a medieval invention. The ancient ones only had single bolts.
    I'm still not here

  4. #4
    Dungalloigh Brehonda Member Ranika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,416

    Default Re: Siege Engine mercenaries

    Excellent, then it should make a good, all-around piece of siege/anti-infantry equipment for barbarian factions. However, which barbarian factions should have them?
    Ní dheachaigh fial ariamh go hIfreann.


  5. #5
    Member Member sharrukin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Canada west coast
    Posts
    2,276

    Default Re: Siege Engine mercenaries

    My guess is that the Bricoli was used by ancient peoples at the time. It would more likely have been used by non-Graeco-Roman cultures as the Greeks and Romans at this time had access to advanced Gastrophetes, Ballista's, Scorpion's and other devices. The more backward barbarians would have used something like the Bricoli in place of these. This is a WAG. The barbarians didn't write the books!

    The Onager looks wrong! It should be replaced by a scaled up Ballista or Scorpion.

    Some information on ancient siegcraft;
    Catapult/Ballista;
    It is interesting to note that the largest stone-thrower on record, a three-talent (78 kilogram) machine, was built by Archimedes.
    This light torsion catapult was the most common type of artillery during the Hellenistic period. With only slight modifications the weapon was employed still in the Early Roman Imperial period, up to ca. AD 100, when the Romans redesigned their artillery. The word catapult derives from the Greek katapeltês and means ‘against shield’; it is an antipersonnel weapon initially and most catapults remained that; they were not often fired at walls with the intention of knocking the wall down; they were fired at the top of walls to keep the defenders heads' down while a ram attacked the wall below. Stone-throwers were built from mid fourth century BC onward, but only after serveral stages of development the mature standard type of the palintonon appeared in the third century BC. The reconstruction sketch drawn after the text of Philon, Belopoeica shows a heavy palintonon for throwing 1/2 talent (ca. 13 kg) stone balls. The total weight of this weapon was about 3 metric tons, the weight of the elastic ropes of the two torsion springs alone ca. 330 kg. In contrast to the euthytonon the palintonon could easily be dismantled into the main components: the two torsion springs with their wooden frames, the long stock (table, ladder and slider) together with winch and pulley, also the carriage. Because of the heavy weight and the sheer size of the palintonon dismantling was indispensable, otherweise the machine could not have been transported over the often poor and narrow roads of Antiquity. The stone balls were fired generally in a flat trajectory, not in a high one as often mistakenly assumed in modern literature.

    The two-armed torsion stone thrower was still employed in the early Roman Imperial period. The Roman author Vitruvius provides a description of the palintonon under the latin name ballista (X.11: De ballistarum rationibus et proportionibus

    Field artillery;
    The first reference to and possibly use of artillery in the field (rather than around a city in a siege) is in 354: Onomarkhos the Phokian deployed them against Philip II, Polyainos 2.38.2. These are ‘stone-throwers’; probably non-torsion like that designed by Charon (dates unknown) as described in Biton (C3? BC).

    http://www.swan.ac.uk/classics/staff/ter/grst/What's%20what%20Things/artillery.htm

    http://www.newton.mec.edu/Brown/TE/C...ations.htmlnot very good but perhaps useful for animations graphics if we decide to use these.

    http://antique.mrugala.net/Rome/Ball...0catapult.html
    "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
    -- John Stewart Mills

    But from the absolute will of an entire people there is no appeal, no redemption, no refuge but treason.
    LORD ACTON

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO