Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Quick Siege Question

  1. #1
    Member Member YAKOBU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    807

    Default Quick Siege Question

    Hi everyone

    I just have a quick question on sieges and can't spot a thread that deals with it. For each year of a siege do the attackers and defenders lose troops like in MTW? I seem to remember seeing a thread on one of the sites that they don't but feel like I have had losses in long sieges. At work at the moment so can't test my theory till I get home. Anyone know for sure ??

  2. #2

    Default Re: Quick Siege Question

    Beats me!!! But I am quite sure that the attackers don't lose any troops.. Wouldn't make much sense if they did as all they basically do is cut off supplies to the city, while staying out of range of any defences and out there they should have enough supplies!! Now defenders losing troops would be more likely due to a certain shortage in food supplies in the city...

  3. #3
    Senior Member Senior Member Tricky Lady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,233

    Default Re: Quick Siege Question

    I'm pretty sure the defenders lose men (attrition I suppose?). I sieged a few turns "till the end" with my Pontic armies as they consisted practically entirely of cavalry. Every turn the defenders lost about 5-10 men per unit (so the Greek hoplites went from 80 to +- 50 when the city fell).
    I didn't lose a single man in the siege.

  4. #4
    Member Member Empedocles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Posts
    158

    Default Re: Quick Siege Question

    I believe attackers should loose men in a siege to reflect rallies made by the defenders and disease (they were really common in armies in a siege).
    It was common practice for the defender to let some units away at night and attack the enemy camp

    Diego, from Argentina

  5. #5
    Ashigaru Member Vlad Tzepes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Romania, The Impaler's Training Ground
    Posts
    393

    Default Re: Quick Siege Question

    Attackers don't lose men while sieging. Defenders do. This is kind of weird, as MTW-VI insisted on the "realism" new feature that forced gamers to attack castles because of the attrition rate.

    IMHO, some attrition should be experienced by attackers in any situation, even when marching, somewhat like the Europa Universalis system. Anyway, to have the defenders die in the city and the besiegers thrive outside is unrealistic at least.
    "Whose motorcycle is this?", "It's a chopper, baby.", "Whose chopper is this?", "Zed's.", "Who's Zed?", "Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead." - Butch and Fabienne ride off into the sunset in Pulp Fiction.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Quick Siege Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Empedocles
    I believe attackers should loose men in a siege to reflect rallies made by the defenders and disease (they were really common in armies in a siege).
    Totally agree. I also miss that from MTW:VI. It's like the besiegers are having one big picnic out there! You burned the fields (and some of our farmers), remember? The EU2 supportable limit for provinces might be nice, but RTW doesn't even need something that complex. Just a limiting factor, possibly based on how many defenders there are, and maybe their composition. If 2 men are left in town, it's safe to say no sorties are forthcoming. But if 50% of the defenders are cavalry, you bet there will be some harrassment sorties!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO