Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: Comparison of Support from CA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member Dionysus9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Mount Olympus
    Posts
    1,507

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    its nice to see that at least one company in the software industry understand the concepts of customer support and quality control.

    too bad they are in the extreme minority.
    Hunter_Bachus

  2. #2
    Member Member Muneyoshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Park City, USA
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    Not to mention the support the creators give at the forums themselves. And I dont mean theirs one account that they post one or two times a day in, I mean everybody has their own account and post countless times a day. Very well supported, if CA would do half of what SI do I would think it was very good support.

    Btw Barry, what you think of FM?

  3. #3
    Member Member allanphillips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    4

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    Cyanide are another rare software company that look after their customers. Their game Chaos League is not a huge seller, yet they keep in touch via the forums and do their best to fix bugs as soon as possible after they are reported. So far they have released 7 patches and the game is now very stable and bug free.

    By the way you should try it - it's a great fusion of RTS and fantasy sports - the only one of its kind and with a thriving community thanks to the developers support. I bought this after the disappointment of RTW and I love it!

    More info and a demo at www.chaosleaguegame.com. Only £11.99 delivered (UK) on www.play.com
    Allan Phillips

  4. #4
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    A recent post made by Obake Date on .Com

    Alright kids, I'm going to try and provide a little bit of history here that should give you some perspective.

    5 years ago (before the release of Shogun:TotalWar), the developers from Creative Assembly were quite active in the community (which at that point consisted of the forums at the org and about 200 patrons). A lot of the same things that we see now were going on back then as well. There were discussions over how people thought that CA should implement this feature or that feature. There were those patrons who were the "fanboy's" and there were also the "flamers", but in general life was pretty good and there were some serious heavy hitters from CA that were participating.

    CA however was a little bit too open with their information, and when they announced that they were going to have to delay the release of the game for 6 months because they wanted to make sure it was done right, they had to endure a torrent of flaming the likes of which no-one should ever have to deal with. They did though for the most part. Some of the heavy hitters said "the heck with this" and have never come back. Things eventually settled down though as most people realized that would in fact rather wait an extra six months instead of getting a buggy game.

    Then CA announced that they weren't going to be able to get the MP campaign working for the release and were dropping it from the feature set. Again, another "storm" erupted. This type of behavior continued, and actually got worse after the demo was released as everyone started spouting off their opinion about what they liked about it, and more often what they didn't like.

    The truth is that the more information Creative Assembly provided to the community about what they were doing and where things stood, the more abuse they ended up taking from the community if even one thing deviated from what they had said. Given that the software development process is pretty much all about "change" they were screwed (name one programmer who's EVER written bug free code other than "Hello World"). Things got so bad that CA refused to take part in the community at all for about 6 months. When they did start to come back, they had learned their lesson the hard way, and would only give out the most general of information. Anyone who's been around since the Shogun days will remember "Two Weeks".

    Point being, the voices of the community have changed, but our song remains the same. If CA were to provide some type of list that mentions what was being looked at, or what had been done they would be flamed by those who didn't get THEIR pet peeve addressed. Then they'd get flamed by those who wanted the patch NOW (which they get anyway). CA is damned if they do and damned if they don't. They have made a conscious decision to make their relationship with the community as hassle free to them as possible (as far as I can tell). You may not like the end result of that decision (I know I'd like more participation and information), but it's the reality that we are all faced with.

    I realize that many of you are thinking "I wasn't here then, it's not my fault so why should I be punished for what happened then". The point is that you're all singing the same tune that CA and the staff here have been dealing with for years. It doesn't make any of the patrons here right or wrong in how you feel. It's just what we've been dealing with every day, and what you consider a lack of feedback is in truth the most effective way to keep the community from degenerating into something on the order of the AOE forums, or Battle.net

    No matter what happens, there is always going to be that percentage of any given community that could care less about being civil, or being able to present their issues in a mature manner. Those people are more interested in causing problems that they are in solving them. Other parts of the community aren't happy unless they have SOMETHING to complain about, and that's all that they do. Sorry guys, but CA doesn't need the grief, and quite frankly neither does the staff.

    There are legitimate bugs with Rome, and as many of these bugs as CAN be fixed WILL be fixed within the timeframe available. Telling you that CA is working on this or that, and what has been done is just opening up the door for those who will say "well what about THIS bug, or THAT issue", or "you've dealt with MY issue, why can't I have it NOW".

    Even if Creative Assembly were to say "the patch will be done in a couple of weeks", how many of you would start complaining that it wasn't ready for download on day 13? And what if another issue cropped up in testing that delayed release for a week. Even if they said so, how much complaining do you think there would be about "yet another delay" and how much more "CA suxxorz" posts do you think we'd see.

    I know that most of you reading this thread honestly believe that it would be far less than what we are seeing now. I'm telling you from 4+ years of experience that you are wrong. We would see SIGNIFICANTLY more complaints and flames than we do now.

    That's life folks. So like Mike said, take the blue pill, and relax. The patch will be here when it's done! ;)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Senior Member Dionysus9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Mount Olympus
    Posts
    1,507

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    Thats a good post by Obake and it explains a lot, but I don't think it excuses anything.

    The creative process will always be subject to criticism, constructive or otherwise, and the manufacturers of a product will also be subject to criticism.

    Dealing with criticism is just part of business, especially in an industry where every product must be a "new creations."

    To hide in your shell in fear of criticism or dialog with the end purchaser is tantamount to suicide. Only very succesfull artists (like Andy Warhol) can still sell their product with the ostrich approach.

    I think CA needs to grow some thick skin and face/discuss the criticism they might receive. The introspection that is necessary to do that will enhance the creative process and result in a better game.
    Hunter_Bachus

  6. #6
    Clan 7BEAR7 Member Clips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    189

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    At least now they have told our community straight on that link found in .net about CA now workign on everything listed in our petition, it may ne until end of January but looking at that screeny, it gives me hope that they may actually do a good job and sort out these bugs. Then your get all us legends in the lobby to sort out what i hear is mostly morons atm.

    Im in Rome some nights but bugs frustrate me, so ever need me in VI or forums most of time ^^
    Yours 7Bear7
    "Let your body and sword be one."

  7. #7
    Wait, what? Member Aelwyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    837

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    Quote Originally Posted by Dionysus9
    I think CA needs to grow some thick skin and face/discuss the criticism they might receive.

    Or, hire someone with this thick skin to deal with it and report back to them with the constructive feedback.

    I have a lot of experience with this. And....I need a new job.....

  8. #8
    Senior Member Senior Member ElmarkOFear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Louisville, Ky. USA
    Posts
    1,856

    Default Re: Comparison of Support from CA

    I am hopeful that the patch will address some of my personal "most-pressing" issues:

    LOBBY
    ------
    Private Chat Rooms (Passworded)
    Added permanent Ban function
    Added permanent Ignore function
    Elimination of the ability to use any name when logging in to MP lobby.
    More game info. in the game listing.
    Ability to see who is in game and who is in lobby (Greyed out names like in MTW or something to that effect)
    Ability of host to determine who has not hit the ready button after army selection has been completed by everyone else.

    GAME
    -----
    Accurate Replay function
    Added logfile function
    Elimination of the ability to "cheat"
    Quicker in game chat (Use T for all, Y for team)
    Elimination of DeSynch problems
    4v4 added back into play
    Decrease in lag and drops (better online/network code)
    Abillity to play with same faction as your teammates or opponents.

    WISH LIST
    ----------
    Map Editor
    Ability to see who is in what games in the MP lobby without having to join the game.

    If most of these items are addressed, you will probably see me more often in the RTW MP lobby. I might even write a story about my experiences as an RTW noobie-type person! Might even be so happy as to play my first TW Single player campaign game! (Don't hold your breath, MP is my vice!)
    Last edited by ElmarkOFear; 12-14-2004 at 06:32.
    I have seen the future of TW MP and it is XBox Live!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO