Hi,

I come here to discuss the completely random, though fun, issue of GAULS vs PARTHIANS.

Basically what happens is; The Gauls and the Parthians have both managed to get very far through the campaign, conquering each half of the world. The Gauls get north-west africa (mauretania to byzacium, plus Gaeutulia), The Parthians get the East plus the rest of Africa. However, if you draw I line from Locus Gothi to Aetolia (Parthia gets Sparta, Corinth and Attica, plus Crete and Macedonia just to be fair), and split the map in half (still noting the exceptions I explained earlier) you get the division of territories.

Now then; each faction has developed economically, militarily and otherwise to the maximum extent possible using the lands THEY HELD, and also the best strategies they could have previously used. I think this is the fairest way of doing it. Note where their armies would logically be due to previous strategy (for example, Parthia would have quite a few troops in Egypt because as we all know Egypt is hard to deal with)

The wars begins with Parthia attacking the south of the province of Africa by boat. Discuss what would happen from there.