Rosa, I think you are going a bit hard at him now...
You seem to think that he implies that only Greeks are biased, yet you quote him where he says everyone does it in the Balkans.
Now he does mention the Greeks as doing it, but he then says that he finds everyone to do it... That he mentions the Greeks specifically it because he was talking about Greek perception and his own perception. That might be wrong to do, but I think he is fair here... And I'm Danish coming into this with no bias at all.Greeks are entitled to read history the way it would make them feel proud of themselves and omit the emberassing or shameful moments. That is their right. In fact all the nations on the Balkans are like that, and that's why it is the backyard of Europe.
And no, history isn't an exact science. We have facts, but how we interpret those facts change from generation to generation, some get revived again. History is a flowing science (for the lack of a better word), the pursuit of the truth (which existed) is nigh impossible. For instance Positivism was quite popular with ist views in the 20's and 30's and 50's, then it vanished while Marxism too over, now it is back in a refined form that has been mixed with Hermeneutics. All of those are different from each other, and their conclusion are all different, yet they are 'true' seen in the context of what would be the logical evolution of events for that particular theory.
It is highly unlikely that we will ever find the truth, and if we do it will soon vanish beneath yet another theory. That is why history will never be an exactl science (unless some physicist invents a machine for timetravel).
Bookmarks