Not wanting to derail the thread, but I do want to comment on the Parthia/Scythia part. Scythians and Parthians are from different times and don't need to be nerfed as much as the Roman archers and Egyptians, etc. The problem with Scythia is that they can't produce many units because they have no real economy. That seems a bit odd to me because the barbarians should probably have hoards of men available for base level units relatively cheaply. So I think they should have more ability to build forces (from economic means) but weaker archer units overall. I didn't have much trouble taking out large Roman stacks with my Scythian horse archers.Originally Posted by The_678
The Parthians are really modeled on a later version of the types of archers the Romans faced I think, not Punic War era. The Punic War era Parthians should be more like the Persian archers that Alexander faced (since their recent ancestors served in Darius' armies.) Archery was not all that effective against Alexander's armies... I could see Parthian archers having weaker stats in the current campaign and higher (closer to what we presently see of the vanilla Parthian units) around the time of the Marian reforms. This gets back to the idea of breaking the era's up a bit and offering different starting points for campaigns. According to "Fighting Techniques of the Ancient World," Parthian composite bows were improved over the Scythian types by addition of stiff straight strips of bone to the tips called "ear laths." These are later era weapons of the first century BC. I've not seen anything to give an idea when improvements came.
Bookmarks