I disagree about Bloom, he has the acting range of a defective squirt gun. He is the same person in every role he plays. Barring the costumes and hairstyles you could interchange all the characters he's played and you would not be able to discern the differences in his performances. Bloom is constantly working not because of his acting abilities but because ever since Lord of the Rings hit the theaters it has been proven that his onscreen presence moistens the seats of young teenage girls and and that directly translates into box office numbers.Originally Posted by Steppe Merc
I definitely agree that Crowe is far superior to Gibson in terms of acting ability. However as far as historical trangressions are concerned Braveheart didn't seem nearly as bad as Gladiator, perhaps because I think it is a superior film to Gladiator. My problems with Gladiator are not simply rooted in its historical inaccuracies. When I watch Gladiator the only thing that I enjoy outside the cinematography and technical achievements is the presence of Russell Crowe, Derek Jacobi, Richard Harris and the 15-20 minutes of carnage that took place in the arenas and colosseum. Beyond those elements I cannot think of Gladiator as anything other than a B flick made on a massive budget. The script is ridiculously shallow and a good chunk of the supporting cast defies all sense of logic and taste. I could have done withouth Joaquin Phoenix and his terrible English accent. Dijmon Honsou sucks, period. That oversized former Mr. Universe/Mr. Olympian German actor who played Maximus' token aryan gladiator buddy would be more convincing if he was cast as a stone wall.
Bookmarks