Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Harder than Carthage?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Harder than Carthage?

    The problem is that for every empire, you will find a point where your win is a foregone conclusion. The question is how long does it take before you reach that point of no return.

    One thing I liked about Moo3 (post-patch) was that when you got behind the curve vs the AI empires, you were in real trouble. Until you could sustain 180-ship battles against multiple enemies, you were in real threat of being annihilated (the 180-ship limit meant that things became equal again, as the AI could have 10x the number of ships in system than you but you only fought 180 of them). My point in bringing this up is that this is the only game I've ever played where I truly felt threatened by the AI without the need for the AI to cheat.

    Unfortunately, RTW isn't like that. Unless you are in imminent threat of dying in the next few turns (or have vastly inferior units to the AI like Carthaginian infantry vs Roman footsoldiers), it is usually straightforward to build up a holding army and start rolling the AI back, no matter how big they are. RTW is particularly affected by this because a well directed army can often annihilate thousand-man armies with only a handful of losses (meaning the same army can then take on another enemy army with little loss in effectiveness). What I found was no matter how bad the initial situation, if I wasn't wiped out quickly, the AI had no hope. Sure it was fun fighting back to some form of parity, but I soon learned that each game was the same, if you played it for conquest only. Unfortunately, the AI is too fickle in the diplomacy realm, pretty much forcing you to take on the world (and repeating the same gameplay pattern again).

  2. #2
    Member Member The_678's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hamilton, Ontario, Canada!
    Posts
    570

    Default Re: Harder than Carthage?

    Yeah this is what led me to start playing GA games in MTW. The same build up then steamroll thing for every faction. It would be great if they had some sort of GA thing in RTW. I don't understand why they took it out. Added great replay value to relieve the boredom of the same old conquest.

    Otto - They call them fingers, but I've never seen them fing...Oh there they go
    Cool Site

  3. #3
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Harder than Carthage?

    The chanllenge scale for goes like this (from hardest to least hard).
    Parthia
    Carthage
    Spain
    Numidia
    Gaul
    Seleucids
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  4. #4
    Swarthylicious Member Spino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    2,604

    Default Re: Harder than Carthage?

    I'd say Armenia is one of the toughest factions to play. Certainly tougher than Parthia, especially when Parthia and the Seleucids decide to double team you in the early game. Once you build hordes of Horse Archers it becomes alot easier. Once you add Cataphract Archers to your ranks you become unstoppable.
    "Why spoil the beauty of the thing with legality?" - Theodore Roosevelt

    Idealism is masturbation, but unlike real masturbation idealism actually makes one blind. - Fragony

    Though Adrian did a brilliant job of defending the great man that is Hugo Chavez, I decided to post this anyway.. - JAG (who else?)

  5. #5

    Default Re: Harder than Carthage?

    Cataphract archers ... now that's just cruel ...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO