Results 1 to 30 of 46

Thread: Realism vs gameplay balancing?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #29
    VOXIFEX MAXIMVS Member Shigawire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Norway, Br?nn?ysund
    Posts
    2,059

    Default Re: Realism vs gameplay balancing?

    Quote Originally Posted by C00lizz
    Granted but one shouldn't downplay Hannibals strategic brilliance despite the opposition.
    Absolutely not. Hannibal's brilliance at Cannae is a shining beacon of inspiring military feat..

    The same applies to the opposite, as one should be careful in calling the Roman plan foolish. Foolhardy, simplistic and stubborn maybe, but when viewed in light of the Romans breaking through Hannibal's line at Trebbia, it's a sound plan.


    Prometheus, the Romans had more than 50`000 infantry. They had 86`000 total. Unfortunately they had the 10`000 Triarii watching the camp. Foolish mistake. If they had kept their Triarii on the battlefield, they might've defended against the cavalry-charges from the rear. And so, at the battlefield, the Romans wielded 70`000 infantry and 6`000 cavalry.

    Polybius writes that:

    Quote Originally Posted by Polybius
    Of the infantry about ten thousand were captured fighting but not in the actual battle, while only perhaps three thousand escaped from the field to neighbouring towns. All the rest, numbering about seventy thousand, died bravely.
    Last edited by Shigawire; 01-14-2005 at 23:10.


    "To know a thing well, know its limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will its true nature be seen." -The Amtal Rule, DUNE

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO