Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 91 to 115 of 115

Thread: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

  1. #91

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    "Time" again to ressurect this thread.

    Today as with all in this series was an incompetant win. BUT it was sooo funny to see the generals nearly punching it out in the studio.

    A classic moment too from Nus getting on his kness and begging one general to "Please please tell him what to do!!"

    And your heart beats so slow, Through the rain and fallen snow across the fields of mourning to a light that's in the distance.
    Oh, don't sorrow, no don't weep
    For tonight at last I am coming home.
    I am coming home.

  2. #92
    The Breath of God Member Divine Wind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Guarding the Shores of Japan
    Posts
    1,317

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Today was a great example of how theyve made this series far too easy for the contestants.

    They did nothing right at all, apart from the planning side, which they did not stick with as the battle started. If it wasnt for the vanilla units they had then it would of been a rout.

    But the show was entertaining. As the previous poster said, a very hot headed affair. Perhaps if we gave the contestants weapons they could recreate some battle scenes in the studio
    "To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
    -Sun Tzu, the Art of War




  3. #93
    Blue Eyed Samurai Senior Member Wishazu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Great Britain
    Posts
    1,679

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    i was utterly convinced they were going to lose right up untill it said "Victory Imminent" i was dumbstruck, as you said they did absolutley nothing right, btw what preofession were they, i only saw the show from the start of the skirmish.
    "Wishazu does his usual hero thing and slices all the zombies to death, wiping out yet another horde." - Askthepizzaguy, Resident Evil: Dark Falls

    "Move not unless you see an advantage; use not your troops unless there is something to be gained; fight not unless the position is critical"
    Sun Tzu the Art of War

    Blue eyes for our samurai
    Red blood for his sword
    Your ronin days are over
    For your home is now the Org
    By Gregoshi

  4. #94
    The Breath of God Member Divine Wind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Guarding the Shores of Japan
    Posts
    1,317

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    They were described as "computer gamers", who played strategy games.

    Didnt see much strategy though!
    "To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
    -Sun Tzu, the Art of War




  5. #95

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    I think the problem is the lack of degrees of loss and victory. There should be more emphasis placed on the actual result. In the case of this weeks battle, the team should have been informed that although they technically won the battle, it was entirely pyrrhic. They did not humiliate the Trojan forces at all (themselves maybe), and their own army was devastated to such an extent they're likely to have to sit outside the bloody city for ten years.

    There's no strategic emphasis, these guys can have but a single man left on the field who has one arm left but it's still a 'victory' even if they're the invaders or something.
    Love is a well aimed 24 pounder howitzer with percussion shells.

  6. #96
    Senior Member Senior Member Duke John's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,917

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    In the case of this weeks battle, the team should have been informed that although they technically won the battle, it was entirely pyrrhic.
    Well, they were being told exactly that. An expert said that even if they knocked politely on the Trojan gate there would be little chance that they would get their princess back. (Did you pass out after the shock of the "You are victorious" message appearing?)

    The gamers had a pretty sound tactic, but it was a camping tactic. If they kept moving along the river and went straight for the right flank of the Trojan army then they would have won decisively. Now they just got distracted and weren't able to cope with more than 2 events.

    And what was with the lang haired dude constantly watching the monitor of the left captain? We've seen generals standing in the front ignoring the nice overhead map, but this is the first time that a general was forgetting entirely that he was a general. At the end he got better, but in the beginning it was like a coach trying to score on the field.

  7. #97

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Quote Originally Posted by Duke John
    Well, they were being told exactly that. An expert said that even if they knocked politely on the Trojan gate there would be little chance that they would get their princess back. (Did you pass out after the shock of the "You are victorious" message appearing?).
    Uh....actually I was kind of....um....squishing a bunch of Celts in Civ III. *runs from hordes of Orgers with pitchforks and fire*
    Love is a well aimed 24 pounder howitzer with percussion shells.

  8. #98

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Perhaps this was their attempt to show us 'strategy gamers' having our heads handed to us and that perhaps it isn't as easy as it looked... nah, we could still thrash them. Bunch of headless chickens.

    Quote Originally Posted by Duke John
    And what was with the lang haired dude constantly watching the monitor of the left captain? We've seen generals standing in the front ignoring the nice overhead map, but this is the first time that a general was forgetting entirely that he was a general. At the end he got better, but in the beginning it was like a coach trying to score on the field.
    Phht, I've yet to see a general worthy of the name. Perhaps the mother in the Battle of Stamford Bridge?

    Nus was very funny though. Couldn't really go wrong with them though, virtually every move they made was a mistake. The 'AI' player must have gone very easy on them. I thought when all those spearmen were charging the rear of the Greek units that it was game over. Only the heroic close quarters ability of their archers and slingers brought it back for them.


    But continuing on in the 'WTF game are they playing anyway?' thread it was nice to see a phalanx that actually worked properly and didn't shuffle or rotate or stood there and got butchered.

    And *gasp* their chariots were actually effective at running down fleeing troops . From my experience the chariots should have wheeled in crazy circles around the archer unit, knocking them down by the bushel just to have them get up again and start running.


    With this and the appalling spin-doctors at Dara looks like the only way a team is going to lose this season is if they auto-resolve. :biggrin:
    Epistolary Richard's modding Rules of Cool
    Cool modders make their mods with the :mod command line switch
    If they don't, then Cool mod-users use the Mod Enabler (JSGME)
    Cool modders use show_err
    Cool modders use the tutorials database Cool modders check out the Welcome to the Modding Forums! thread Cool modders keep backups Cool modders help each other out

  9. #99

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Aye I was a bit miffed at how good those chariots were.

    Its the reason I get fed up with the Brits and I havent even played the egyptians yet.
    And your heart beats so slow, Through the rain and fallen snow across the fields of mourning to a light that's in the distance.
    Oh, don't sorrow, no don't weep
    For tonight at last I am coming home.
    I am coming home.

  10. #100
    Member Member RJV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    157

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Total, utter Numpties this week. The Captains wanted to be Generals and the Generals wanted to be Captains. Didn't stick to the plan, turned the ENTIRE army to have one big-ass exposed flank - which any decent player, and even, please God, the AI - would surely have ploughed headlong into with anything and everything, got totally enveloped in the centre, and STILL won.

    It's still an entertaining show - Nus is worth the price of admission alone - but it would be nice if once, just once, they had a challenging battle on there.

    Cheers,

    Rob.
    Olaf the Flashy - the Bling Bling Viking

  11. #101

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    I still want to see Nus and three other military experts to be in command, now that would be good

  12. #102
    Member Member MacBeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    66

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    I can't believe Nus lectures at Sandhurst any more. The more he hams it up on this show the less credible he becomes.

    Dumbed down TC just like RTW.

  13. #103

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    I liked the very enthusiastic medieval weapons expert who was on the one with the viking huscarles. He was also on Weapons that made Britain. He should have a five minute slot every episode.


  14. #104
    Member Member lanky316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Huntingdon, Cambs, England
    Posts
    137

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    ^^^^

    Mike Loades, he was on channel 4 on Saturday trying to recreate a realistic jousting tournament, don't know how accurate it was but it wasn't terribly tacky viewing.

  15. #105

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    I rented a video about the Crusades over the weekend, written and narrated by Terry Jones (he of Monty Python fame) and who should turn up but lo and behold Mike Loades!

    Bearded and becoiffed he was demonstrating what it was like to be a Turkish horse archer on a mare in heat when you've got a randy Crusader stallion barrelling down on you.
    Epistolary Richard's modding Rules of Cool
    Cool modders make their mods with the :mod command line switch
    If they don't, then Cool mod-users use the Mod Enabler (JSGME)
    Cool modders use show_err
    Cool modders use the tutorials database Cool modders check out the Welcome to the Modding Forums! thread Cool modders keep backups Cool modders help each other out

  16. #106

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Quote Originally Posted by Epistolary Richard
    Bearded and becoiffed he was demonstrating what it was like to be a Turkish horse archer on a mare in heat when you've got a randy Crusader stallion barrelling down on you.
    I'm sorry Mr Richard, you can't leave it like that... What was it like?

  17. #107

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Quote Originally Posted by lanky316
    ^^^^

    Mike Loades, he was on channel 4 on Saturday trying to recreate a realistic jousting tournament, don't know how accurate it was but it wasn't terribly tacky viewing.
    I watched all but the last 10 mins of that - I thought it was cool.

    But who won? the scot?
    And your heart beats so slow, Through the rain and fallen snow across the fields of mourning to a light that's in the distance.
    Oh, don't sorrow, no don't weep
    For tonight at last I am coming home.
    I am coming home.

  18. #108
    Member Member lanky316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Huntingdon, Cambs, England
    Posts
    137

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaldhore
    I watched all but the last 10 mins of that - I thought it was cool.

    But who won? the scot?
    Nah, surprisingly it was the American cop who kept injuring himself.

    As for last nights TC. The team had some right moves but didn't capitalise, they managed to get the English to break formation but didn't take advantage. I blame the woman who argued over every decision the generals made.

  19. #109

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Yeah, I started off thinking they'd stand no chance. Then they did those feigned retreats and I thought damn, these guys really know their stuff. Finally I watched them not capitalise upon that at all, and instead just hammer the cavalry into the front of the shieldwall constantly, slowly murdering themselves by attrition. At that point I knew they'd lose horribly.
    Love is a well aimed 24 pounder howitzer with percussion shells.

  20. #110
    Chief Biscuit Monitor Member professorspatula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Inside a shoe.
    Posts
    1,158

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    That battle of Hastings battle looked great. I want those units in RTW! Come on CA, be generous!

    I found it amusing how the 'historical experts' always go into such explicit detail of how the armies at the time fought, looking like complete idiots at the same time. But they mention stuff that is far beyond the scope of the game. Norman Knights on horses throwing their spears and then closing in with swords? No, just spears doing not much at all. Although even the American sounding expert seems to be a bit disillusioned these days.

    As to the battle, I thought it was a pretty good display overall, certainly better than the previous contestants I'd seen. One general shouted out some orders regularly, another general didn't know what he was doing (although got a bit better towards the end), and the captains seemed to get on with the task in hand. One of the women was incredibly vocal and I feel sorry for the computer operator who's ears must have ached after her shrieks battered his eardrums constantly, but at least she was in continous communication and giving out orders and actually sounded pretty knowledgeable.

    Everything went wrong, but it's hard to be critical of the team. What can they see? Hardly a thing. Without the luxury of controlling the camera and the battlefield for yourself, it must be a nightmare to work out what is going on. It doesn't help there are 3 levels of communication before anything gets done: General > Captain > Computer operator/geek > computer. I'm pretty sure those chaps on the computers aren't without blame. Tell the cavalry to go wide and clear of the enemy and the idiot has them bash into the sides of the enemy spearmen. Happens in every battle. The cretinous presenter doesn't help with his incessant 'come on just get stuck in, this is boring' type comments. I'm hoping one of the contestants will take one of those replica spears the historical experts prance around with, go up to the presenter, and shove it where the sun don't shine.

    All in all, a bit of a rubbish TV show. I wonder if the primary/secondary weapon stat bug is in that show and the stamina bug? And I'm pretty sure the morale is considerably higher on the show than we get too.
    Improving the TW Series one step at a time:

    BI Extra Hordes & Unlocked Factions Mod: Available here.

  21. #111
    Member Member Lord of the Isles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    286

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    The bit I liked in this week's show was one of the two "questions to the experts" that they are allowed every week. "Can the archers and crossbowmen fire over the heads of friendly troops or must they have a direct line of sight" asked one of the contestants. He was told they could both fire either way and I thought: the RTW engine I know is going to kill a lot of your own troops if you try to fire over them. But I can't remember if that happened in the battle: anyone else notice?

  22. #112

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Missed it this week :/ *sigh*
    And your heart beats so slow, Through the rain and fallen snow across the fields of mourning to a light that's in the distance.
    Oh, don't sorrow, no don't weep
    For tonight at last I am coming home.
    I am coming home.

  23. #113

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    I have a few comments on this week's show but my first one is:

    HAROLD GODWINSON FIGHTING ON HORSEBACK??????

    AAAAAARGH!!!!!!!


    Thanks I just needed to get that off my chest.
    Epistolary Richard's modding Rules of Cool
    Cool modders make their mods with the :mod command line switch
    If they don't, then Cool mod-users use the Mod Enabler (JSGME)
    Cool modders use show_err
    Cool modders use the tutorials database Cool modders check out the Welcome to the Modding Forums! thread Cool modders keep backups Cool modders help each other out

  24. #114
    Member Member lanky316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Huntingdon, Cambs, England
    Posts
    137

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Quote Originally Posted by Epistolary Richard
    I have a few comments on this week's show but my first one is:

    HAROLD GODWINSON FIGHTING ON HORSEBACK??????

    AAAAAARGH!!!!!!!


    Thanks I just needed to get that off my chest.
    #On a related subject I found it hilarious when the team charged that unit of cavalry and celebrated killing Harold before later seeing William hacked to death at his own personal hands.

  25. #115

    Default Re: Time commanders new series success or faliure?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord of the Isles
    The bit I liked in this week's show was one of the two "questions to the experts" that they are allowed every week. "Can the archers and crossbowmen fire over the heads of friendly troops or must they have a direct line of sight" asked one of the contestants. He was told they could both fire either way and I thought: the RTW engine I know is going to kill a lot of your own troops if you try to fire over them. But I can't remember if that happened in the battle: anyone else notice?
    Well they didn't show any "blue on blue", but it looked like thier archers were miles away from the rest of their troops anyway!

    Since 1.2 you can place your missile troops behind the rest of your army and they work quite well (slingers aren't as good, but then they tend to shoot slowly and generally be rubbish anyway!). In fact it makes the game that bit easier as you can sting a unit with arrows and it will then charge straight into your waiting infantry. Particularly useful when playing as a Greek faction.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO