Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Roman General

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Alienated Senior Member Member Red Harvest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Searching for the ORG's lost honor
    Posts
    4,657

    Default Re: Roman General

    There was actually some sort of law that they had to fight on foot in a specific office (consul/dictator?) until some date when things changed. It might have been about the time of Telamon, 225 BC, I can't recall. It might have been 100 years earlier. I know I've seen the references but I cannot recall where. There was some exception made because of the need to do a rapid forced march for interception of a major threat.

    Was it practical or sane as warfare advanced? Hell, no! Traditions often aren't. Remember that the legions were originally hoplites and military tradition changed slowly over centuries. Hoplites scorned cavalry in ancient times. "Real men/citizens" fought in the ranks. It is much different than modern armies or later armies: where the rank and file are middle class at best, and often recruited primarily from the less wealthy (as happened in later Roman history.) In hoplite and Republican legionary society the foot soldiers were the upper class and dipping down to upper middle class. There was also a wealthy elite equestrian class. For hoplite warfare you had to be wealthy to afford both the gear, and the time away from your property for a military campaign. (The hoplite panoply was equivalent to about 6 months to 1 years wages.) If only we could do the same today...would be nice to see some of our "leaders" actually fight at least in their youth rather than hiding in the National Guard and failing to even show up for mandatory service for extended periods, they might do a bit better job of managing a war...but I digress.
    Rome Total War, it's not a game, it's a do-it-yourself project.

  2. #2
    Ambiguous Member Byzantine Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,334

    Default Re: Roman General

    I agree. I would like to see leaders of countries actually be there in the moment of fighting. The morale would be unbreakable. I hate this coward system that modern warfare has created. It's become almost obsolete for any high rank to actually be there fighting. We should look at the honor of battle again.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Roman General

    Quote Originally Posted by Byzantine_Prince
    I agree. I would like to see leaders of countries actually be there in the moment of fighting. The morale would be unbreakable. I hate this coward system that modern warfare has created. It's become almost obsolete for any high rank to actually be there fighting. We should look at the honor of battle again.
    You want to be in a foxhole with George Bush or Bill Clinton? 'Cause... yeah.

  4. #4
    Not Just A Name; A Way Of Life Member Sarcasm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olissipo, Lusitania
    Posts
    3,744

    Default Re: Roman General

    I wouldn´t. But it would be for diferent reasons for each one.....



    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars

    -- Oscar Wilde

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO