Would 1.2 be better with traits removed altogether?

**Khorak** · 02-22-2005, 18:08

No! And I shall slap you with this fish until you repent!
*slap*

**Bob the Insane** · 02-22-2005, 18:13

I have to agree with the fish slapping man... Even with the traits bing a bit buggered it is still better with them than without...

**hrvojej** · 02-22-2005, 18:24

No traits = greatly diminished roleplay.

**The Stranger** · 02-22-2005, 18:31

how could you even ask such question. are you high or something.

**The Stranger** · 02-22-2005, 18:32

how could you even ask such question. are you stoned thing.

**Tricky Lady** · 02-22-2005, 18:45

Double post Emperor Umeu...

Well, I hadn't noticed that the traits were that bugged....

Disappointing.

On the other hand, you would take away a nice incentive to roleplay your family members if the traits are removed.
I'd keep 'em, just for the sake of gameplay (and roleplaying).

**The Stranger** · 02-22-2005, 18:48

no one says high other says stoned

**Red Harvest** · 02-22-2005, 18:58

Having traits this badly bugged means we end up with clones. Fight any and you get horribly scarred. You also get a bunch of stars. The AI doesn't. So I have to wonder from a gameplay standpoint if the game might actually work better without them.

A poorly executed feature is often worse than no feature at all. Simple stars based on battles won and titles seems an improvement at the moment. That and getting coward vices when you run. I don't feel that the current system is actually *adding* to the game.