Ah, generals... :))

[Chelifer]

The year is 57BC. A bunch of bored young generals have finally found a way to entertain themselves









Actually, I didn't expect them to perform *that* well.

[Oaty]

Actually, I didn't expect them to perform *that* well.

well it's part of the "generals less suicidal" of the 1.2 patch


Cavalry might have toned down a bit but to me it seems they made the bodyguards stronger.

What sucks is you probabaly could beat the whole campaign teaming up your generals under 1 command.

[Colovion]

That's awesome.

But I'm still confused how you could drag the game on till 57BC....

[The Stranger]

what the .... 57bc i can't even get to 170 bc. you should remove the 2 HP of general units, cause the general alreadu has 2 HP why should the bodygaurds be uberunits.

[Count Belisarius]

Hilarious! I never would have thought of that!

[King Clas]

you seem to have bypassed the unit limit? how did you manage to get more units on the field than allowed?

[Chelifer]

That's awesome.

But I'm still confused how you could drag the game on till 57BC....

Apparently, it was 75BC, but it does not make much of a difference, I guess :)



As a bonus, drag it a little bit further and I am going to witness the birth of you know who

[The Stranger]

wow and you did that in 200 years man you're slow i counqered the world in 235 bc

[Chelifer]

wow and you did that in 200 years man you're slow i counqered the world in 235 bc

I guess there is something critical I don't know yet. How do you guys manage to keep public order in new cities? I pretty much have to keep an army that has taken a city inside the city and recruit a new stack to move on. Now I could possibly field around 20 full-strength high-tech armies if they didn't have to babysit those oversized cities.

[Colovion]

wow and you did that in 200 years man you're slow i counqered the world in 235 bc

Well some people take a long time on purpose. I'm with you though, I can't draw the game out that long for some reason; just my play style I guess.