Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Brainstorming: Inconsistencies in the unit file

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member sunsmountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    414

    Default Re: Brainstorming: Fixes for inconsistencies in the unit file

    IIRC, there's an inconsistency about Armenian heavy spearmen, they get phalanx mode AND the +4 bonus vs cav that non-phalanx spearmen get.
    Yeah but they're still weak as crap.


    Also, I think unit sizes should be consistent, I'm thinking of Egyptian archers, scythian noblewomen, egyptian desert cav and arcanii here, don't know off my head if those are all. they should have the same size as like units.
    Arcanii have 2 hitpoints each (and have a general-assassin-type/role), egyptian archers and desert cav have higher upkeep than similar troops of other factions, and scythian noble women is probably low on numbers for some historical accuracy.

    The only reason i can think of for this thread to exist is for multiplayer balancing, other than that i yet have to hear the first good reason.
    in montem soli non loquitur

    (\_/) (>.<) That's what happens with bunnies
    (x.X)(_)(_) who want to achieve world domination!

    becoming is for people who do not will to be

  2. #2
    Bug Hunter Senior Member player1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    1,405

    Default Re: Brainstorming: Fixes for inconsistencies in the unit file

    Quote Originally Posted by sunsmountain
    The only reason i can think of for this thread to exist is for multiplayer balancing, other than that i yet have to hear the first good reason.
    What so wrong about pointing inconsistencies?
    Some of them could actually be errors or typos, and not design decisions.
    Last edited by player1; 05-14-2005 at 17:51.
    BUG-FIXER, an unofficial patch for both Rome: Total War and its expansion pack

  3. #3
    Member Member sunsmountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    414

    Default Re: Brainstorming: Fixes for inconsistencies in the unit file

    Well i find nothing inconsistent about the unit rosters: I have nothing else to compare it to. Although there could be typo's of course.

    The Spanish barbarians have mass value of 1, interesting, but does that mean we wish to change that? The title of this thread suggests 'Fixes' of some sort, and perhaps im not clear on the purpose of this thread.
    in montem soli non loquitur

    (\_/) (>.<) That's what happens with bunnies
    (x.X)(_)(_) who want to achieve world domination!

    becoming is for people who do not will to be

  4. #4
    Bug Hunter Senior Member player1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    1,405

    Default Re: Brainstorming: Fixes for inconsistencies in the unit file

    Quote Originally Posted by sunsmountain
    The Spanish barbarians have mass value of 1, interesting, but does that mean we wish to change that? The title of this thread suggests 'Fixes' of some sort, and perhaps im not clear on the purpose of this thread.
    Search for potential typos that are not ment to be?

    Anyway it's mostly brainstorming, since it's very subjective what is an error, or what is not the way it is designed to be.


    Although I must say that Pontic Phalanx Pikemen unit size seems suspicious to me. Their stats are pure copy of Armenian Heavy Spearmen, with exeption of long pikes. Then their desciption says that they have 8 rows, while in reality it is just 5 due to their 40/80 stack size. Not to mention 5 shiled bonus, with their small sheild.
    BUG-FIXER, an unofficial patch for both Rome: Total War and its expansion pack

  5. #5
    Member Member Sfwartir's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Norvegia Superior
    Posts
    146

    Default Re: Brainstorming: Fixes for inconsistencies in the unit file

    Quote Originally Posted by player1
    Although I must say that Pontic Phalanx Pikemen unit size seems suspicious to me. Their stats are pure copy of Armenian Heavy Spearmen, with exeption of long pikes. Then their desciption says that they have 8 rows, while in reality it is just 5 due to their 40/80 stack size. Not to mention 5 shiled bonus, with their small sheild.
    Good point, I've noticed this and it seems rather awkward. Bug? Or is it some historical facts on Armenia that backs this up?
    Orgia bona hic in his septem diebus?
    //Any good orgies here this week?//

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO