Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Spqr

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member Tomisama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,836

    Default Re: Spqr

    Would someone please put up a link to the download to save time.

    Thanks
    HONOUR IS VICTORY - GO WITH HONOUR - KEEP THE CODE

    http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198003816474

  2. #2
    PapaSmurf Senior Member Louis de la Ferte Ste Colombe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Alps Mountain
    Posts
    1,655

    Default Re: Spqr

    I have not found that SPQR and vanilla battles feel that different regarding duration; the chance that a melee would last 6 full minutes without an ennemy units coming to make a difference are small. One on one tests are not showing that tactics may make a difference much before the one on one is over.

    I have played a few test games in 1.2, running heavy cavalry into phalanx with phalanx on and guard off: phalanx came on top. I mean long pike phalanx (the regular kind) against praetorian cavalry and the like... Silver shield phalanx against praetorian would take like 15% casualties and rout the cavalry killing 80% of them.

    Whether I put cavalry on wedge, or tried to get some wrapping effect changed the outcome little. In RTW 1.2, spears will beat cavalry; the main issue is to get the cavalry to run into the phalanx, or to get the phalanx to catch the cavalry... Usual issue. SPQR has not fixed that...

    A broken army never come back to win, but it rallies again and again. Thanks to sky high morale.

    Aren't shield protecting from arrows in 1.2 too?

    Louis,
    [FF] Louis St Simurgh / The Simurgh



  3. #3

    Default Re: Spqr

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis de la Ferte Ste Colombe
    I have not found that SPQR and vanilla battles feel that different regarding duration; the chance that a melee would last 6 full minutes without an ennemy units coming to make a difference are small. One on one tests are not showing that tactics may make a difference much before the one on one is over.
    Sure if you flank or get flanked the battle will be over quickly. Play someone who doesn't allow you to flank them, and the battle will last longer. I just proved that the units fight much longer in SPQR mod. That fact provides more time for maneuvering at the height of the fighting. If you loose the first unit in SPQR, you are in serious trouble as that extra enemy unit can come and flank one of your other units and then you'll be down two units, and it only gets worse from there. The men in SPQR die very quickly when hit from behind usually on the first strike which is due to a game mechanic built into the battle engine. If there would be any criticism of the dynamics in SPQR, I would expect it to be that units fight too long thereby allowing other units to come from too far away. However, flanking was decisive in many ancient historical battles. SPQR mod is the first mod I've seen that actually allows a battle like Marathon or Cannae to be fought with success the way the historical battle was actually fought.

    I'm not answering the rest of this post. If you don't see the dramatic difference in the shields, then forget it. I know you don't advocate mods for online play even when the gameplay is clearly better: i.e. Samurai Wars for MTW/VI or any of the fine mods that CBR made for MTW. SPQR unit balance isn't perfect, but the gameplay in RTW v1.2 is the worst of the entire Total War series. Surely, you're not trying to tell me that RTW v1.2 MP gameplay is good are you? Although many players say they want more balanced gameplay online, very few will actually leave the "offical" gameplay in which CA refuses to fix even blatant balance issues.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  4. #4

    Lightbulb Re: Spqr

    i found that the spqr mod doesn't feel that different than v1.2 it can also get a bit laggy sometimes
    The bigger the weapon the harder it is to pick up.-Shadow
    member of the lords of midnight
    visit us www.lordsofmidnight.tk


  5. #5
    PapaSmurf Senior Member Louis de la Ferte Ste Colombe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Alps Mountain
    Posts
    1,655

    Default Re: Spqr

    Quote Originally Posted by Puzz3D
    Sure if you flank or get flanked the battle will be over quickly. Play someone who doesn't allow you to flank them, and the battle will last longer. I just proved that the units fight much longer in SPQR mod.
    Sure, one on one fight last longer, but in the larger context of a full battles, with flanking taking place, and many, many other things happening, chances are indeed small that the battle will last when the melee started. In MTW, the battle would be over before the one on one are over; there is always a flanking move, this is not a game of attrition, a battle is not a sum of 1v1 fights.

    We can have 1v1 unit fight for 30 min with some stat tweaking, and still get some fast battles.

    That fact provides more time for maneuvering at the height of the fighting. If you loose the first unit in SPQR, you are in serious trouble as that extra enemy unit can come and flank one of your other units and then you'll be down two units, and it only gets worse from there. The men in SPQR die very quickly when hit from behind usually on the first strike which is due to a game mechanic built into the battle engine. If there would be any criticism of the dynamics in SPQR, I would expect it to be that units fight too long thereby allowing other units to come from too far away. However, flanking was decisive in many ancient historical battles. SPQR mod is the first mod I've seen that actually allows a battle like Marathon or Cannae to be fought with success the way the historical battle was actually fought.
    I got a few other issues with SPQR mod in MP; cavalry fails to clear skirmisher or light infantry the way it does it in vanilla; that somehow reminds me of pavese in VI on hold/ hold and cavalry getting stuck in them. Very high morale creates router chasing problems; for me battle last long because the ennemy keeps rallying and coming back...


    I'm not answering the rest of this post. If you don't see the dramatic difference in the shields, then forget it.
    Difference in shield is just the same as everything else in the mod; a multiplication of factors. The effect was already there in 1.2, it's amplified here, and it has some odd consequences; flank shoot look almost magical. Does it really matters? IIRC missile attack has been increased too, so now we're looking at very large discripancies in archery effect depending on that multiplied shield factor. I don't like it. It was already working in vanilla; it's a case of fixing one aspect that was not broken that leads to odd phenomenon.

    A shield value of 5 already have a very noticable impact on archery in vanilla, why was it needed to increase to such value?

    I guess because the defense value got so high that keeping a "reasonnable" shield value in regard of archery was no longer possible without making shield irrellevant in melee fight?
    A shield of 5 might be good for archery, but useless for melee if all units got defense of 40...
    And for me, all the mod is like that.

    I know you don't advocate mods for online play even when the gameplay is clearly better: i.e. Samurai Wars for MTW/VI or any of the fine mods that CBR made for MTW. SPQR unit balance isn't perfect, but the gameplay in RTW v1.2 is the worst of the entire Total War series. Surely, you're not trying to tell me that RTW v1.2 MP gameplay is good are you? Although many players say they want more balanced gameplay online, very few will actually leave the "offical" gameplay in which CA refuses to fix even blatant balance issues.
    Although I am sceptical of modding success, I have played a few mods, including Reconquista, MP Wars, STW (before it was rebalanced, barroca version)... I am playtesting 4 mods in RTW. If I don't play Samurai Wars, it's mainly because I don't play VI period.

    I'd like to point that topic:

    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=43786

    I am not a happy camper, and I have no issue with modding. SPQR may have felt good for some people for some good reasons, it does not cut it for me. Yuuki, I think that you could do a better job for balancing MP than SPQR modders did and with probably less issues. It's fairly obvious they have SP in mind; nothing wrong with that, and I hope they'll be very succesfull with this mod in SP and I got no doubt many players will like it.

    Given that SPQR is filled with inflated values, I don't think it's a good base for additional MP balancing. In my opinion, tweaking vanilla 1.2 will be better than tweaking SPQR.

    Louis,
    [FF] Louis St Simurgh / The Simurgh



  6. #6

    Default Re: Spqr

    Louis,

    Ok. I got a response from LT1956, and it is as you say. SPQR was made for SP. He can't play multiplayer, and it will never be balanced for MP. The problem with the shield is that SPQR was made for v1.1, and LT1956 says it's the RTW v1.2 patch that messed up the way shields work in SPQR. It's too bad because the graphics are nice and the unit selection seems better to me, i. e no dogs and pigs. So, the best thing is probably to make a new stat for RTW v1.2. The problem is getting players to agree on one stat.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO