It says it is, doesn't it?Originally Posted by SEH
![]()
Ahh.. couldn't resist the temptation...
Thanks for the info, we appreciate it. Did you find out if the AI picks only the formation with highest priority (other filters passed), disregarding all the ones with lower priority, or does it apply a small random factor to its checks?
Yes, the parser is quite sensitive. e.g. you can't use the normalised_rot without using normalised_pos, and both of those commands exclude the relative_ -commands. There's not going to be phalanx lines with angled flanks. /EDIT actually that's not the case
Yes, it's a shame. Although, we don't know all the possible AI flags that affect the formation selection checks. There could be more than the regular attack/defend and bridge flags, but I doubt it.Originally Posted by SEH
They are as clear as a sunny day in Sahara, no need to get worried.Originally Posted by SEH
![]()
Thanks!Originally Posted by Jambo
Had they changed the interunit spac. in bridge-specific formations, or was it because some other formations had been tinkered with? (Now, it wouldn't be anything new if AI got bugged because of a legal command in another section of the script)
Oh.. My bad.Originally Posted by Kraxis
Bookmarks