Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Something the EB higher-ups should look into

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Simulation Monkey Member The_Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,613

    Default Re: Something the EB higher-ups should look into

    Ah, thank you! Advertisement is always appreciated. Well, at least on some occasions.

    Anyways, I thought you guys *might* be interested in my formation mod, so hence this post. I would have no objections against working for EB, in fact I'd be pleased to help in a project as famous as the EB.

  2. #2
    graduated non-expert Member jerby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    ..your not my mother..
    Posts
    1,414

    Default Re: Something the EB higher-ups should look into

    wow, terrifc the mark. really.
    what else can be done with formations in rtw? add ones? like box ( or circular) shaped with ranged within and cav behind or something. or a wedge of infantry? echelon perhaps, but first explain me what the use is:D.

  3. #3
    Simulation Monkey Member The_Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,613

    Default Re: Something the EB higher-ups should look into

    wow, terrifc the mark. really.
    Can't blame a man for trying.

    what else can be done with formations in rtw? add ones? like box ( or circular) shaped with ranged within and cav behind or something. or a wedge of infantry? echelon perhaps, but first explain me what the use is:D
    Well, the AI *might* get the hint and accidentally use the new formations as meant to. Anyways, anything is better than the RTW standard.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO