Results 1 to 30 of 40

Thread: scythed chariots

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Thread killer Member Rodion Romanovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    5,383

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Reply regarding roman chariots: I read that romans used scythed chariots against Pyrrhus's elephants, which is slightly before the time of the mod, but it would have been theoretically possible for romans to continue the making of such chariots after that because they had the technology. The reason why they didn't was due to the weaknesses of chariots, weaknesses that aren't illustrated in the vanilla R:TW engine. I'd like it very much if EB could make the player realize why chariots became obsolete. First of all, they are useless in terrain that's only slightly more complicated than a field, secondly it costs more with 2 horses than 1, and finally their manouverability is restricted. Thirdly, they are harder to bring to the battlefield, and four: there were many very effective counters for chariots that made them less useful - for example letting the chariots through your lines by stepping aside etc. (an exploit of their lack of manouverability), but that function does not exist in R:TW. Oddly, neither does vanilla R:TW seem to add any penalty for chariots or cavalry when they are on steep hills, where they in real life would be less effective than on moderately steep hills. Chariots are more sensitive to steepness of hills than cavalry though.

    In R:TW, chariots are sometimes MORE useful than cavalry, so if romans would get the realistical ABILITY to build chariots that would be an improvement for them, which is strange. It must be admitted though that a heads-on charge chariots to cavs would probably be won by the chariots or at least be suicide for the cavalry. A chariot charge to the rear of a pinned enemy formation would also do more damage than a cavalry charge to the rear of an enemy formation - during the IMPACT phase. During the coming meleé, the lack of manouverability would mean the chariots would get into trouble if the enemy formation didn't rout after the impact phase of that charge. So - it should be mentioned that chariots still had abilities and strengths cavs DIDN'T have. However in a cavs vs chariot battle the cavs would of course scatter and get out of the way of the chariots, then attack the flanks or rear of them (thus once again exploiting lack of manouverability), and easily win. Once again, this ability is not included in R:TW, if chariots charge your cavs you can't get out of the way. Oddly enough chariots are faster than cavs, IMO that seems unrealistic but for that particular idea I have no proofs/sources.

    IMO the most realistic implementation would be to add ability for romans to build chariots, but on the battlefields it should be clear WHY the real romans, despite the ability, didn't produce chariots after some time between 300 BC and 270 BC. So the abilities to scatter formations and let chariots through them should IMO be included, maybe as a toggle button like "skirmish mode".

    What do you think of that, and is it possible to implement?
    Last edited by Rodion Romanovich; 03-21-2005 at 11:37.
    Under construction...

    "In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore

  2. #2

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Not to mention, scythed chariots was EXTREMELY limited by terrain. They were used by Darius in one of his battles against Alexander (stupid leaky memory, keep forgetting names!). In that battle, Darius had to PURPOSELY smooth over a section of the battlefield to use the chariots, since broken ground would have destroyed their wheels VERY quickly.

    For the romans living in mountainous Italy, it was a bit hard to use chariots due to terrain difficulties. This is why the Celts, living in grasslands where farmland was plentiful, used chariots, but they used chariots in a different way to scythed chariots, using them pretty much as an effective taxiing system to get warriors into battle and out of them, NOT in the fighting. Julius Caesar comments on this usage of the chariot, and his quote says something about how this use of chariots combined the maneuvrability of cavalry and the staying power of infantry.

    Plus, by that time Rome is set in, many armies in the world (besides the Barbarians really) would be disciplined enough for the scythed chariots to be completely and utterly useless.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Senior Member Oaty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    2,863

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Is it possible to arm chariots with javelins or is that hardcoded?
    When a fox kills your chickens, do you kill the pigs for seeing what happened? No you go out and hunt the fox.
    Cry havoc and let slip the HOGS of war

  4. #4

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Chariots in R:TW are weak against elephants? They actually seem to be one of the more effective counters to elephants. Not as good as a phalanx, but better than any other cav, in my experience.

  5. #5
    Thread killer Member Rodion Romanovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    5,383

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Quote Originally Posted by Furious Mental
    Chariots in R:TW are weak against elephants? They actually seem to be one of the more effective counters to elephants. Not as good as a phalanx, but better than any other cav, in my experience.
    Cathapracts are the only cavs that can kill elephants effectively in vanilla R:TW. Chariots usually get slaughtered (which IMO is bad especially for scythed ones who should hurt the eles a little more than they do in vanilla R:TW), as the eles have a +attack bonus vs chariots. Chariots vs eles is almost as bad as wardogs vs eles, and I believe many of you have seen that .wma file where 3 armored eles take on 20 units of wardogs? If not, open a custom battle and zoom in the front of the eles for a good laugh .
    Under construction...

    "In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore

  6. #6
    graduated non-expert Member jerby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    ..your not my mother..
    Posts
    1,414

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    ok, that's about all to answer my question, thnx

  7. #7
    Member Member anonymous_joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Hibernia: A.k.a Éirinn
    Posts
    63

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Quote Originally Posted by Shadar
    Not to mention, scythed chariots was EXTREMELY limited by terrain. They were used by Darius in one of his battles against Alexander (stupid leaky memory, keep forgetting names!). In that battle, Darius had to PURPOSELY smooth over a section of the battlefield to use the chariots, since broken ground would have destroyed their wheels VERY quickly.
    It was Gaugemala. And the scythe chariots were obsolete even then, (330-ish), Darius brought them back as a surprise, but the Agrianians and other light troops made mince meat out of them.

  8. #8
    Member Member Mr Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    In a chair
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    They could be very effective if cleverly used .
    Pontus used them in 61 BC, on the plains before Ennium to fatally cripple a Roman army {which was then destroyed with 38,000 Romans dead} . First the light horse feined a charge kicking up lots of dust which conceiled the 500 scythed chariots and 10,000 Galatian mercenary infantry following close behind . The cavalry threw some javlins at the Romans to provoke them into forming tesudos and then quickly wheeled to the flanks to occupy {and destroy} the Roman cavary and the chariots with Galatian infantry following charged the Roman lines whom were too late spotting the threat to reform {their tightly formed tesudos were highly vunerable to such a charge} . The chariots smashed great , bloody holes in the Romans' lines that the Galations poured through to have a feild day of slaughtering {or a happyhour perhaps ;p} .
    The first Roman line simply ceased to exist , and the second and third were very badly mauled . That the Romans chose to charge the Pontic main army later suggests that the general wasn't very good that day as they were already beaten by that charge .


    Pontus might be the only "faction" in the games' time period that actually had a net positive experience with using scythed chariots {the Selucids had a questionable time with them , Rome only used something barley similar twice and Egypt never had the at all} .
    7 out of 10 people like me ,
    I'm not going to change for the other three .

  9. #9
    graduated non-expert Member jerby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    ..your not my mother..
    Posts
    1,414

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    well, egypt had chariots. but then it was in 1200BC, acctually. the entire egypt missed it by 900 years!

  10. #10
    Probably Drunk Member Reverend Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Up on Cripple Creek
    Posts
    4,647

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Here' a suggestion that'll piss off a lot of people:

    just take out chariots entirely, except for Pontus. From what I've heard, the Seleucid chariots were ineffective, and the Britons used them mainly for transportation, so they can be dropped there; also, as it has been said, they simply didn't exist elsewhere.

    Correct me if i'm wrong, but don't be condascending.

  11. #11
    Not Just A Name; A Way Of Life Member Sarcasm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olissipo, Lusitania
    Posts
    3,744

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Quote Originally Posted by meatwad
    From what I've heard, the Seleucid chariots were ineffective (...)
    Yes, they were. The art of driving a chariot effectively in war had disapeared from the Near East almost entirely. Still, my opinion is that the Seleucids should have them anyway. But this is not up to me...
    Quote Originally Posted by meatwad
    (...) the Britons used them mainly for transportation, so they can be dropped there;
    Actually, it was sort of a platform for leaders to fight from. We have no way of knowing how trully effective they were, but they existed. Some were even present when Caesar first landed in the southern shores of Britannia, near present-day Dover (I think...).
    Quote Originally Posted by meatwad
    (...) also, as it has been said, they simply didn't exist elsewhere.
    Some Celtic cultures still used them to a certain degree, the fact that they were declining in use, doesn´t mean they didn´t exist then.



    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars

    -- Oscar Wilde

  12. #12
    Senior Member Senior Member Hakonarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,442

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Quote Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
    Reply regarding roman chariots: I read that romans used scythed chariots against Pyrrhus's elephants, which is slightly before the time of the mod, but it would have been theoretically possible for romans to continue the making of such chariots after that because they had the technology.
    These were not realy chariots - they were carts, filled with slingers and javelinmen, and hung about with spiked beams and firepots IIRC - I think they arementioned in Plutarch's "Life" of Phyruss.

    they were not a notable success - I seem to remember they are attributed with holding up the elephants for a small amount of time only.

    More like mobile fortifications than chariots.

  13. #13
    Thread killer Member Rodion Romanovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    5,383

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    Quote Originally Posted by Hakonarson
    These were not realy chariots - they were carts, filled with slingers and javelinmen, and hung about with spiked beams and firepots IIRC - I think they arementioned in Plutarch's "Life" of Phyruss.

    they were not a notable success - I seem to remember they are attributed with holding up the elephants for a small amount of time only.

    More like mobile fortifications than chariots.

    Cool, have any pics of them? How did they do in combat vs other units than elephants? The lack of success is definitely true because afaik the romans never used the chariots after the wars with Pyrrhus.
    Last edited by Rodion Romanovich; 03-23-2005 at 17:32.
    Under construction...

    "In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore

  14. #14
    Magister Vitae Senior Member Kraxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Posts
    7,129

    Default Re: scythed chariots

    The warcarts themselves did the job well enough, the elephants didn't like them at all, but then the elephant drivers merely headed the elephants out of the way, problem solved. Then the Romans on the carts could just stand there being ignored. Until I guess some infantry took them out.
    You may not care about war, but war cares about you!


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO