Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior member Senior Member Dutch_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Holland.
    Posts
    5,006

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    it's good that CA actually commented on this matter
    also nice to know that they are trying to make a better AI in the next products
    I'm an athiest. I get offended everytime I see a cold, empty room. - MRD


  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Oaty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    2,863

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    So if the generals are modded to a weaker unit, and then taking into account they have a unit of cavalry that is stronger than the general............ would I be less likely to see the general on the opening phase of combat.

    Movement speeds in a way kills the A.I. even when support was alongside the cavalry it is quickly lost in the quick charge.

    The other problem is I found a weak center is a killer for the A.I.

    I've found it is usually best to put your worst units in the center. Well the A.I. hits your weakest units pushing them back and in no time the A.I.'s best units are surrounded on 3 sides
    When a fox kills your chickens, do you kill the pigs for seeing what happened? No you go out and hunt the fox.
    Cry havoc and let slip the HOGS of war

  3. #3
    Alienated Senior Member Member Red Harvest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Searching for the ORG's lost honor
    Posts
    4,657

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    The weak center effect makes sense. I've long used the approach of keeping weaker units in the center. Great generals sometimes did this with weak or unreliable units (Hannibal for instance.) It boosts their morale because they are near the best officers, they are supported on the wings, and they can't very easily run away. No wonder the AI is always charging my center with all its captains and generals.

    I'm glad to see CA's explanation, but I still can't understand why they didn't opt for pushing other strong units against the weak point, rather than the general's cav. He really should have been used primarily as a heavy reserve.
    Rome Total War, it's not a game, it's a do-it-yourself project.

  4. #4
    Cellular Microbiologist Member SpencerH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Hoover "Two a day" Alabama
    Posts
    932

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    Its not that generals shouldnt be thrown into the fray, its that timing when to use generals is tricky. Too soon and they get chopped, too late and they're ineffective. There must be some way to mimic human calculations as to when to employ them.
    E Tenebris Lux
    Just one old soldiers opinion.
    We need MP games without the oversimplifications required for 'good' AI.

  5. #5
    Alienated Senior Member Member Red Harvest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Searching for the ORG's lost honor
    Posts
    4,657

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    I err on the side of not throwing them in until I'm sure they will be decisive or can't easily be killed. I'm not quite sure how to get the AI to make the same determination other than holding them as a heavy reserve. Most of the time when I commit my general it is to *counter* the AI's general or cavalry. The rank and file are already committed.
    Rome Total War, it's not a game, it's a do-it-yourself project.

  6. #6
    Vermonter and Seperatist Member Uesugi Kenshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Mountains.
    Posts
    3,868

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    If the enemy has a large advantage in number, style and ability of troops they do not usually do the suicide general charge. I was playing my Sparta campaign today and had to take on a Roman army that heavily outnumbered my troops. The general was only comitted after the computer's flanking attempts had failed and my phalanxes were reforming. Seems to keep with what CA said...
    "A man's dying is more his survivor's affair than his own."
    C.S. Lewis

    "So many people tiptoe through life, so carefully, to arrive, safely, at death."
    Jermaine Evans

  7. #7
    Member Member Attalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in green fields, with the sun on my face..
    Posts
    97

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    Nice to see a post from a CA staffer!

    Heck..even Sega is posting at the .com these days...(did anyone ever hear from Activision?)

    It's also reassuring that CA still appears to consider the TW franchise a viable product and is more than likely considering either an expansion or parallel product.

    Gee...this post sounds like a bit 'o trolling...but I'm just happy to see CA actually communicating with us 'target audience' again.

    Not just giving us the 'party line'.
    -Attalus-
    Fool me once...shame on you
    Fool me twice...prepare to die

  8. #8
    EBII Council Senior Member Kull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    El Paso, TX
    Posts
    13,502

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    Quote Originally Posted by SpencerH
    Its not that generals shouldnt be thrown into the fray, its that timing when to use generals is tricky. Too soon and they get chopped, too late and they're ineffective. There must be some way to mimic human calculations as to when to employ them.
    There probably is. Most good generals - and all great ones - could sense when the enemy's morale was at it's weakest, and knew that was the time to "throw in the reserve". Since this is a game, unit morale level is a mathematical number, and hence potentially "knowable" by the AI. The recommendation which follows is probably not moddable, but should be "codable" if CA really wants an elegant fix to the problem:

    Given that unit morale is a mathematical value, it should be possible to hold back the AI General until such time as he "knows" an opposing unit is about to snap, and then - and only then - would the AI release the General into the fray. Better yet, you could adjust this "knowledge" using a factor based on the General's Ranking (number of stars). For example: During a battle, as soon as the first enemy unit sees it's morale fall to a critical value (such that one more shock would surely break it), this value is immediately passed on to the AI, which factors it. If the AI General has 1 star or less, there's only a 40% chance he'll get the order to attack. If it's 2-3 stars, maybe it's a 50-60% chance, and so on until you get a 5-star or greater general who will be given the unfactored number and will always know "the time is right". The corollary to this is that AI generals who never get that message will withdraw rather than fight at all - which I suspect is the more realistic historical outcome anyway.

    (Note: The number of stars and corresponding percentages are just examples, the real values would have to be playtested to find the optimal combinations)
    Last edited by Kull; 03-25-2005 at 06:38.
    "Numidia Delenda Est!"

  9. #9
    Alienated Senior Member Member Red Harvest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Searching for the ORG's lost honor
    Posts
    4,657

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    Kull, I can't disagree with the basic premise...except for trying to adjust if for general's stars. That is a slippery slope. I'll stick with the ideology of focusing on building one decent AI. (The old KISS principle.) Now, if the AI gets so good that the average human player cannot beat it on equal terms, then it is time to start artificially handicapping it. We are a long way from that at the moment.
    Rome Total War, it's not a game, it's a do-it-yourself project.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Explanation of Suicidal Generals from CA

    i hate the way that an AI reinforcement general suicidally sacrifices himself.. i lost a faction leader in one of my first campaigns like this!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO