Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Roundtable (a proposal)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Toh-GAH-koo-reh Member Togakure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Zen Garden
    Posts
    2,740

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Quote Originally Posted by theother
    I think it should be entirely possible to get a good, intelligent debate going in the Frontroom. As long as it stays civil, why not? Perhaps what we need is to make better use of the Frontroom?
    Probably because the mundane posts of us ballsy, stoopid street folks annoy the Ivy League intellectual geniuses here. If this proposal were to go forward, they could gather in one place and avoid the sheep, peasants ... and wolves.

    By all means, as far as I'm concerned; my buttons will get pushed less frequently, and hence, I won't feel the need to blast them off of their pedestals as often, pissing off the masses. If they haven't learned to appreciate us yet, then they likely never will.

    I'm ready, Anti-Togas: blast me with your cries of dissent and "hypocrisy!" Talk to the butt ... (looks for BA smiley ...).
    Be intent on loyalty
    While others aspire to perform meritorious services
    Concentrate on purity of intent
    While those around you are beset by egoism


    misc kanryodo

  2. #2
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Quote Originally Posted by TogakureOjonin
    Probably because the mundane posts of us ballsy, stoopid street folks annoy the Ivy League intellectual geniuses here. If this proposal were to go forward, they could gather in one place and avoid the sheep, peasants ... and wolves.

    By all means, as far as I'm concerned; my buttons will get pushed less frequently, and hence, I won't feel the need to blast them off of their pedestals as often, pissing off the masses. If they haven't learned to appreciate us yet, then they likely never will.

    I'm ready, Anti-Togas: blast me with your cries of dissent and "hypocrisy!" Talk to the butt ... (looks for BA smiley ...).
    here, here...couldnt have put as eloquently myself..it just seems like super-ego masturbation...imho
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  3. #3

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pindar
    The Frontroom has all the allure of asking one their favorite color: again and again
    The Frontroom is GREAT as it is. People are stimulated differently because people have different interests. For example, this proposed Roundtable, IMPO, has the allure of pseudo-intellectualism, and will be as shallow to me as the Frontroom is shallow to you.

    This proposed Roundtable divides the Tavern into - for the lack of a better term - perceived "scales of intelligence". Currently, the Tavern is divided into Light and Heavy topics.

    Your characterization of the Frontroom as not smart, the Backroom as smart and rowdy, and the proposed Roundtable as instantly civil and intelligent (smart and unrowdy) has the earmarks of elitism.

    Intellect is just a word. If you look at the earth, it is nothing compared to the size of the universe, which is the whole reality of it all. What matters is how each and every person is stimulated. Since every person has a different set of interests, they have different means and ways of getting stimulated. The Tavern already caters to the varying degrees of personal interests of all the members.

    Characterizing one set of interest as more important than the other is wrong and ironically, uncivil.

    For a book club, I suggest the Mead Hall where we post and critique each other's works & writings.

  4. #4
    Things Change Member JAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    London, England.
    Posts
    11,058

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Your characterization of the Frontroom as not smart, the Backroom as smart and rowdy, and the proposed Roundtable as instantly civil and intelligent (smart and unrowdy) has the earmarks of elitism.
    He is a conservative...

    *Damn, you know those are the kinds of remarks he is talking about!*

    Don't worry I will proceed to lash myself a million times for the terrible comments I make and let us hope you never meet people as foul mouthed as I in your day to day exchanges. May you go to your luncheon with your extra special friends Pindar.
    GARCIN: I "dreamt," you say. It was no dream. When I chose the hardest path, I made my choice deliberately. A man is what he wills himself to be.
    INEZ: Prove it. Prove it was no dream. It's what one does, and nothing else, that shows the stuff one's made of.
    GARCIN: I died too soon. I wasn't allowed time to - to do my deeds.
    INEZ: One always dies too soon - or too late. And yet one's whole life is complete at that moment, with a line drawn neatly under it, ready for the summing up. You are - your life, and nothing else.

    Jean Paul Sartre - No Exit 1944

  5. #5
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Quote Originally Posted by JAG
    He is a conservative...

    *Damn, you know those are the kinds of remarks he is talking about!*

    Don't worry I will proceed to lash myself a million times for the terrible comments I make and let us hope you never meet people as foul mouthed as I in your day to day exchanges. May you go to your luncheon with your extra special friends Pindar.
    That was actually uncalled for given the nature of the watchtower and the proposal made by Pindar - and is nothing other then a ad hominem statement.

    I would like to see this type of discussion remain civil when its just asking about the possiblity - one I do not agree with by the way. We should try it in the front room as a light discussion on topics that are interesting to several. We can even try it in the back room - with a dedicated moderator to delete the attempts at derailing the thread.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

  6. #6
    Moderator Moderator Gregoshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Central Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    12,980

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Backroom style "discussion" tactics in the Watchtower. Lovely.

    Edit: Oh, Redleg beat me to the point...
    Last edited by Gregoshi; 03-31-2005 at 06:45.
    This space intentionally left blank

  7. #7
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Quote Originally Posted by Gregoshi
    Backroom style "discussion" tactics in the Watchtower. Lovely.

    Edit: Oh, Redleg beat me to the point...
    Hell I only spend time in two rooms in the forum - I saw this one and thought the idea had merit - and still do - and since I have calmed down slightly in my rethoric - its not hard to spot the BS when I see it now.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

  8. #8
    Toh-GAH-koo-reh Member Togakure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Zen Garden
    Posts
    2,740

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    VK hopefully you will join them if this idea takes off. I'll enjoy not having to put up with such blatant, hypocritical arrogance anymore because I'll know where it hangs out and can avoid it.

    It has everything to do with “pseudo-intellectual,” “super-ego-masturbation.” Perhaps it's a smell to which you are used, and thus no longer recognize. "it is a mere wish of one individual to have more productive and more sophisticated discussion. Considering some responses in this thread, I can see exactly what Pindar is missing."

    Listen to yourself ... sounds like you are quite familiar with the nature of super-ego-masturbation to me.

    ***

    I see most threads simply as conversations, and in conversations it's natural for subtopics to pop up, and for the discussion to go off on tangents for a while. What's the big deal? I think some folks here are a bit anal-retentive--either that or they have a subconscious desire to control the behavior of others--all this whining about staying on topic, etc. (not in this thread, but in general; I'm not reacting to anyone in particular here). I've also seen people losing arguments resorting to the "off topic" claim in order to bail out of an embarrassing situation for them. All in all, what I'm saying is, it's natural for discussions to shift. I find many of the shifts quite interesting, and in some cases, "thread-savers." This is a casual forum, not an intellectual one. If someone wants an intellectual forum, what are they doing here?? Are they looking to be big fishies in a small pond??

    In threads that I've started, where I wanted folks to focus and stay on topic, I stated that in the first post, and policed the thread myself as the inceptor. If someone wants to have a serious discussion in a thread I suggest this method. I haven't encountered anyone yet that has blatantly disrespected my desire to stay on topic in such threads, and a mod can always be called in if someone gets really out of line.

    But this is off-topic so ... back to the topic.
    Be intent on loyalty
    While others aspire to perform meritorious services
    Concentrate on purity of intent
    While those around you are beset by egoism


    misc kanryodo

  9. #9
    Senior Member Senior Member Ser Clegane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Escaped from the pagodas
    Posts
    6,606

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Personally I do not think that we need an additional Tavern-room for intellectual discussions, as I believe the Frontroom and the Backroom are perfectly fine for these.

    OTOH I cannot help but be surprised what an uproar Pindar's suggestion caused

    BTW, if you want to see a real "elitist" OT forum, just visit the TWC...

  10. #10
    The Anger Shaman of the .Org Senior Member Voigtkampf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Holding the line...
    Posts
    2,745

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    One rotten apple spoils them all.

    Nice idea, but doomed to fail. It resembles somewhat of that Conservative club that has been established in the Backroom; it was supposed to serve as a place for conservatives to discuss issues among themselves without liberals charging in and attacking them all together. Now, who could keep the liberals out, or any other group for that matter, out of any “special” club? We have some share of resident trolls that will charge in, smack anyone with a club and grin with satisfaction.

    What stands in the way of intellectual discourse in general are the people unable to remain cool and objective, tolerant and respective towards other people’s opinions and stances. So it’s back to colors and camps again. How annoying.

    Oh, and gentlemen, this idea has nothing of “pseudo-intellectual” or “super-ego-masturbation” scent to it; it is a mere wish of one individual to have more productive and more sophisticated discussion. Considering some responses in this thread, I can see exactly what Pindar is missing.




    Today is your victory over yourself of yesterday; tomorrow is your victory over lesser men.

    Miyamoto Musashi, The Book of Five Rings, The Water Book

  11. #11
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    The idea still has merit I believe - however for it to work it will take a dedicated moderator who stays involved in the discussion and will delete posts that are not in line with the discussion to keep it somewhat clean.

    Futhermore it would take a concentrated effort by those who wish to partake in the discussion not to be derailed by the trolls and the OT discussion points.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

  12. #12
    Member Member ah_dut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    2,292

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    Quote Originally Posted by voigtkampf
    One rotten apple spoils them all.

    Nice idea, but doomed to fail. It resembles somewhat of that Conservative club that has been established in the Backroom; it was supposed to serve as a place for conservatives to discuss issues among themselves without liberals charging in and attacking them all together. Now, who could keep the liberals out, or any other group for that matter, out of any “special” club? We have some share of resident trolls that will charge in, smack anyone with a club and grin with satisfaction.

    What stands in the way of intellectual discourse in general are the people unable to remain cool and objective, tolerant and respective towards other people’s opinions and stances. So it’s back to colors and camps again. How annoying.
    As has already been stated, you're going to have to find a ruthless mod if you wanna make it work. It may result in a lot of whining as well...I think Greg got reassigned to the monastary from the EH because of time issues (please correct me if I am wrong.) I doubt he'd want to police such a forum that tightly...

    Also, for intellectual discussion, just use the monastary and/or mead hall for whatever is relevant. Yes, the backroom is divided into camps a lot of the time; but isn't the roundtable going to be crewed by the same people to a great extent? So therefore, people are usually going to stay in those camps no?

    Just another patron expressing his views

  13. #13

    Default Re: Roundtable (a proposal)

    How about the thread-starter specifying the parameters of discussion?

    i.e.

    Thread header: The Terri Schiavo Case (C) (btw, R.I.P)

    Rated C = Civil (no cussing, no taunting, no slurs etc.)

    Also, I reiterate, the Frontroom is great for its function.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO