If a 'newbie' already uses autocalc, then changes to it won't matter. They'd have to play actual battles for it to change at all.Originally Posted by Shambles
No, it just means you are more likely to win a battle. Assuming that you've always won in the past.CON
battles that could have been lost Due to a Mistakee Are now able to be won Purly becous you didnt make a mistake in the past,
What "lack of leadership"? The only "leadership" in a battle comes from your general. Anything else is just the player playing a battle.CON
No Affect of lack of leader ship when There is No leadership,
And where did you get that ridiculous idea from? No one said anything about winning making you invincible, or anything close to it. The idea is to make autocalc'd battles closer match the players battles. You'd have to be invincible in your played battles for it to even remotely be an issue.CON
After a Number of wins Auto calc would make you Invulnerable to defeat,
So your big argument against basically comes down to "well, you might make a mistake"? Great argument.Even if you may have made a mistake in the actual battle and could have sufferd great losses, Becous your now using Auto calc You would win as auto calc would Not be able to mimic that mistake that You could have made,
Besides which, the random factor involved would still emulate a "mistake" anyway.
Uh, have you even played the game? There is no way the AI could be that effective. Even in 4vs1 odds battles, the AI barely has a chance of winning. To suggest that the AI, when vastly outnumbered, has even the remotest chance of winning is absurd.Ive decimated huge armies with 1 group of archers,
and even though they eventualy routed and lost the battle, they did some decent damage, Becous of the way AI attacked,
Now If i can do it,
Im shure the pc can do it as well.
And once again you demonstrate your complete lack of comprehension of the idea. Let me state this just once more, on the off chance it'll sink in (in bold, maybe that'll help you notice it):If the AI also used auto calc in this way,
Say mori had been beating uesgi all day long,
And then u come along with Twice as many men,
Auto calc would just let you win,
Even if mori had been beating people sencless all day with Less men than the opponent,
So wouldnt it be better To also impliment This auto calc for the AI,
I.e
Mori had 100 archers,
who were attacked by 200 asgari samurai, (also ai)
and mori won.
yet if you went in there with your same 200 asgari against his 100 archers,
and you had been wining previous battles,
Auto calc would say You won,
But if you implimented it for th ai as well,
Then Mori could indeed beat you.
This would be fair,
But it would also render your Idea Pointless,
The idea is to make autocalc fight more like the player themself fights.
That's it. Since the AI never actually fights a battle vs other AI, then how could this idea be applied to the AI at all (obvious answer: it can't). You keep telling people to "read what you write". Perhaps you should try that yourself.
Bh
Bookmarks