I don't think this is particularly different to the way I play - I like to have an advantage in quality or quality, but given the choice I'd take quality any time.Originally Posted by Innocentius
I've always taken Forrest's quote "Get there the fastest with the mostest" to mean with the most effective force, not necessarily the most men.
The ratios I referred to are casualty exchanges, and its true the best way to inflict lots of casualties is to convince the AI it can win a battle when it can't - e.g. a well-defended bridge battle.
I've never been a fan of halberds, probably because I'm impatient and like to get in and kill the enemy fast when I'm attacking. After reading your accounts I think I should give them more of a chance. In my last English campaign I used CKs and longbows as my troops of choice, not cheap to build but quite hard to beat, but I always kept a few mounted up to keep the battle flowing.
Bookmarks