Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Combat in EB?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Combat in EB?

    A question; how is combat going to be split in EB. Classic Total war games had it; sword inf beat spear inf, ranged inf beat sword inf, cal beat ranged inf, spear inf beat cal, cal beat sword inf. Thats were I think the main problem is RTW they have split combat very badly. Light Cal way too powerful in especially in the charge. In RTW there is also no real medium cal/inf were they should be.

  2. #2
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Combat in EB?

    it's more like this

    sword inf beat spear inf
    ranged beat inf
    cav beat ranged
    cav vs sword inf is a tie
    cav loses vs spear inf
    and HA beats all hahahahaha

    We do not sow.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Combat in EB?

    My question is how will it work in EB? Will you use the old TW system?

  4. #4
    Member Member Benny Moore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    77

    Default Re: Combat in EB?

    Since when has sword infantry (apart from legionaries and the like, which are more like big shield infantry than sword infrantry) been able to consistantly beat spear infantry? The spear is the superior weapon, and the sword is supposed to be for backup.

    Indeed, in a duel with equally skilled fighters, one with sword and the other with spear, the spearman will win more often.

    It seems to me that there should be no "sword infantry;" I can't think of many times when soldiers were equipped with swords as their primary weapon. Again, I make an exception for legionaries, because while their swords are arguably their primary weapons, it is their shields that makes the soldiers so effective and are almost really their primary weapons, if not offensive ones. In fact, if I were to be placed into a battle and was given the choice of either a scutum or a gladius, I'd take the shield!

  5. #5
    (Insert innuendo here) Member Balloon Bomber Champion DemonArchangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Washington D.C
    Posts
    3,277

    Default Re: Combat in EB?

    The shield was the prirmary Legionary weapon. The boss was thick, hard, heavy and created alot of blunt force trauma, even through armor.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    China is not a world power. China is the world, and it's surrounded by a ring of tiny and short-lived civilisations like the Americas, Europeans, Mongols, Moghuls, Indians, Franks, Romans, Japanese, Koreans.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Combat in EB?

    there are numerous cases of infantry armed mainly with swords.

    the celts were famous for it, at the time of hannibal many of them still fought naked with nothing but shield and sword.

    some iberians also fought with shield and sword only.

    some landsnechkts (sp) regiments also used troops with very large swords to break through the pikes of the enemy.

    the main thing is that a spear is much cheaper, so they were used extensively in the dark ages as all the european economies collapsed.

    that said the shield of the legionary was used in an offensive manner to knock his opponent over, before dispatching him.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO