Y'know, about what somebody posted up there about those who play FPS trying to play RTW... it's hilarious, but i know precisely what you mean. And about us forumers being more intelligent than most others, well, but of course. :-) Partially it's because some of us here are history buffs who've done enough research here (as I've read on some other threads) to be academics in their own right, and partially because what we are doing is intellectual activity, those that play FPS are just shooting shooting shooting like mindless automatons. So we hone our minds, they dull theirs. In an ethic where courage is everything, and daring to attack in the face of the enemy is the key, no wonder they can't survive in ours where there are so many things to balance, and where they're not controlling one person, but thousands, and where not every person is armed with combat knife, pistol, assault rifle, and knowledge of urban warfare.

RTW rocks as a strategy game, and BI looks to improve that experience. I am straight-facedly pretending there is no such thing as AI, because that would spoil the whole thing.

The Huns with 15 full stacks now... isn't that a little too overpowered for them? I mean, firstly the Huns only had about 200000 warriors when they poured into modern-day Hungary, and they had to get allies along the way. That translates, if the RTW scale is full-stack = 40000 men IRL, into only 5 full-stacks?