two of the funniest things you've ever said DonCreationism is a religious outlook. Creation science is neither: creationism, nor science, and it's where those claims really break down. God planted dinosaur bones out in Utah to test the Faithful... give me a freakin break.
There is a relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny.As far as macro evolution goes I dont see any more proof that its correct anymore than I do that creationist are correct.
If one looks at the developmental stages of mammals, for example, one sees the embryo starts out quite undistinguishable from other mammals but as it grows into a fetus it shows more and more differentiation until it is recognizable as the species it is.
This is due to the information that has been stored in the genetic code through billions of years of evolution. Clear and convincing evidence, stuff that is subject to confirmation through the scientific method.
Creationism involves faith, faith in untestable things. That's the difference between science/fact and theory/myth.
ichi![]()
Bookmarks