Didnt we just go through the fact that nothing in science is really provable beyond a doubt? Its only our educated guess and rationalization.That is profoundly not true. The scientific method could not be more different from religion. A scientist makes a guess (a theory) about how the world works consistent with data he himself has observed (or others he trusts has observed). He then tests his theory by seeking data that would disprove it.
I think you couldnt be more wrong. These holy books were written after thousands of years of observing human behavior and most of what they say still rings true today. If your talking about creation then you have a point . But again science can do no better job on the subject. Im still waiting to hear how scientists explain where matter came from.A religious thinker formulates his ideas based largely on "revealed" "truth" (eg a holy book) and then seeks to avoid having them tested at all.
Bookmarks