What is your point? There are more moral things that can be done with your money, so you think it is right to steal? Again it comes down to priorities. If you want to help others and give money to charity, do so. But that requires you to prioritise your money at the expense of something else, in this case, R:TW.Originally Posted by IliaDN
No, they were attempted moralisations, using (bad) economics as a justification. The fact that you do not have sufficient information about a product before a purchase is no reason to be able to steal something. You can accept the risk and purchase it anyway, not accept the risk and do not purchase it, or wait to gain more information. All three of those are legal and moral. Stealing it is not.Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
Hold on, a few posts up you were haranguing me about using an example that was of a price different to a game. Now you go and compare a car to a game. Make up your mind. Either we can compare things with different prices or we can't.Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
Well I wasn't, but since you decided to bring it up I'll deal with it, you say it is up to the pirate to do the right thing. Let's look at you here. You have allready admitted you are not a moral person. Furthermore, you have allready stolen it, again you are not painting a picture of yourself that says "I am one likely to do the right thing". My faith in you, or any pirate to do the right thing can be approximated to zero.Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
But regardless, lets actually attack the main body of this argument. Even if you do "the right thing", you have still held it for some time, and taken advantage of it. You have stolen for that time. Now you have two options here, you destroy the pirated copy and buy it or you destroy it and don't. If you destroy it and buy it, for the sake of simplicity, I'll agree that for that game, there was no moral wrong.
However the second option means that you have played the game (presumably substantially because you want to get a feel for it beyond what a review writes), without paying for that priveledge (and yes it is a priveledge, even if you do not enjoy it). In this case a moral wrong has occured. You have appropriated a priveledge, without any form of compensation.
Now we have two scenarios, one in which there is no moral wrong, another where there is. However because any real life case of a pirate pirating to check games first would have a mixture of the two (because if it was allways the case that you buy the game afterwards, why would you bother pirating beforehand?), there will allways be a degree of moral wrong.
The only moral justification for pirating is if you allways by the games afterwards, and if that is the case, there is no point to pirating.
Feel free to keep pirating, I'm not going to try and stop you. But please don't keep driveling this pseudo-moral garbage.
Anyway, I'm going to bed.
Bookmarks