Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 46

Thread: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

  1. #1
    For England and St.George Senior Member ShadesWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Staffordshire, England
    Posts
    3,938

    Default US anger at Saddam underwear shot



    Nice story guys, good way to upset half the world.

    The US military says it is investigating "aggressively" after a picture appeared in a British paper showing Saddam Hussein half naked.
    The Sun newspaper's front page image showed the former Iraqi president in a pair of white underpants.

    Other pictures showed Saddam Hussein washing his socks in a bowl, shuffling around and sleeping on his bed.

    The US said the photos appeared to breach Geneva Convention rules on the humane treatment of prisoners of war.

    "Multinational Forces-Iraq is disappointed at the possibility that someone responsible for the security, welfare, and detention of Saddam would take and provide these photos for public release," a statement from the US-led force said.

    "This lapse is being aggressively investigated to determine, if possible, who took the photos, and to ensure existing procedures and directives are complied with to prevent this from happening again."

    'Compelling image'

    The Sun refused to say how it got hold of the pictures, or when they were taken, insisting it needed to protect its sources.

    It defended its decision to publish them.

    We thought long and hard about publishing, and took the decision that they're such incredible pictures of the world's most brutal dictator... they were a compelling image that any newspaper or broadcaster would publish," the paper's managing editor, Graham Dudman, told the BBC News website.

    The Sun cited US military sources saying they handed over the pictures showing Saddam as "an ageing and humble old man" in the hope of dealing a blow to the resistance in Iraq.

    "It's important that the people of Iraq see him like that to destroy the myth," the paper said the source said.

    Saddam Hussein is awaiting trial on numerous charges in Iraq, including murdering rivals, gassing Iraqi Kurds and using violence to suppress uprisings.

    It is not clear when he will go on trial.

    The official US military statement said the pictures might be a year old.


    They show Saddam with a moustache, rather than the beard he sported when he was captured in December 2003, and again when he appeared in court last July.

    The Sun said the former Iraqi leader, 68, was allowed black hair dye to disguise his grey hair.

    The paper said Saddam Hussein is kept in a 12ft by 9ft (4m x 3m) cell "somewhere near Baghdad", that he has a desk and a pink plastic chair "which he tends to use as a bedside table".

    He is watched round the clock through CCTV cameras, even when he goes to the toilet, the paper said.

    The source added that Saddam was one of the best behaved prisoners they had had, it said.

    ShadesWolf
    The Original HHHHHOWLLLLLLLLLLLLER

    Im a Wolves fan, get me out of here......


  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Ser Clegane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Escaped from the pagodas
    Posts
    6,606

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    While I am surprised (well ... perhaps not really) that the Sun feels compelled to make this the top news, I think the Sun has shown considerably worse on their title page.

    I wonder if half the world really will get upset about it (I assume you are referring to muslims). After all, what we are seeing here is a murderer of countless muslims and some of his followers are still going around murdering muslims in Iraq.
    Last edited by Ser Clegane; 05-20-2005 at 14:47.

  3. #3
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Rediculous.

  4. #4
    For England and St.George Senior Member ShadesWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Staffordshire, England
    Posts
    3,938

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    I was not only thinking of Muslims.

    I thought about America herself, how it would respond to the pictures being aid.

    You would have expected it to be a top security prison, yet first the pictures have been taken, and secondly they have been passed onto theh sun.
    ShadesWolf
    The Original HHHHHOWLLLLLLLLLLLLER

    Im a Wolves fan, get me out of here......


  5. #5
    Senior Member Senior Member Ser Clegane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Escaped from the pagodas
    Posts
    6,606

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadesWolf
    I thought about America herself, how it would respond to the pictures being aid.

    You would have expected it to be a top security prison, yet first the pictures have been taken, and secondly they have been passed onto theh sun.
    Good point - the fact that somebody in this prison leaked the pictures is actually more newsworthy than the fact that Saddam is wearing ugly underwear.

  6. #6
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    The real prison news is in The New York Times today. I guess American media aren't all pathetic after all.
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  7. #7
    warning- plot loss in progress Senior Member barocca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    (*disclaimer* - reality may or may not exist, in some societies reality is a crime, punishable by life)
    Posts
    5,341

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    i want you all to take a deep breath,
    look carefully at the underpants

    now follow closely and enunciate clearly...
    "pho" "toe" "shop" "ed"

    i think what we really need to do is send the Sun a big thank you that someone on their staff "added" undies to what would otherwise have been a GROSS pic...

    and the pic breaches the geneva conventions,
    but then,
    as far as i recall, chopping heads of civilians while videotaping them and then giving the tape to TV stations is not in the geneva convention either...
    ...i best go look that up, just to be sure....
    The winds that blows -
    ask them, which leaf on the tree
    will be next to go.

  8. #8
    probably bored Member BDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    5,508

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    It's a good way to destroy any remaining authority he had.

    Of course some religious fanatics will find a way to get annoyed about this, they always do.

  9. #9
    This comment is witty! Senior Member LittleGrizzly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The wilderness...
    Posts
    9,215

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    i want you all to take a deep breath,
    look carefully at the underpants

    now follow closely and enunciate clearly...
    "pho" "toe" "shop" "ed"


    you sure ?

    The real prison news is in The New York Times today. I guess American media aren't all pathetic after all.

    surely deserving of its own topic adrian ?
    In remembrance of our great Admin Tosa Inu, A tireless worker with the patience of a saint. As long as I live I will not forget you. Thank you for everything!

  10. #10

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Yeah saw the paper this morning thouht it was Wrong,
    But what do u expect from the sun,
    mostly perverts and people who wont buy a tv gide buy it,
    theres never anything worth reading in it.

    and dosent displaying pictures of prizoners in theis manner breaks some laws?
    Like the geniva convention?
    Not that it matters any more What with Yanks saying it dosent affect them so lets torture muslims untill thy say they are terrorists In guantanomo
    Let alone Insult (for want of a better word) some religions.

    But having said That I wasnt to Happy about CNN and there Live covarage of the twin towers afair,
    Was more of a Guess which window theyl jumpout of next thing.
    Anything for a bit more Viewers/readers

    Its a good think im not in charge though,
    Id nuke the Whole human race including me,
    Cos Humans Really agrivate me
    Last edited by Shambles; 05-20-2005 at 15:34.

  11. #11

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    The Sun has sunk to new levels

    Is it really the most read paper in the UK? - says alot

  12. #12
    Chief Sniffer Senior Member ichi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3,132

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    CIA agent: "OMG I can't believe that you printed those photos *wink*.

    We are going to aggressively find out who shot those pics because Saddam was under the tightest securit in the entire history of the world and we have no idea who got in his cell with a camera *wink*.

    This is horrible and violates several conventions and just because it humiliates him and shows he is no longer a threat we totally hate you for printing it you lovely bastards *wink wink*"

    ichi

    BTW I refuse to look at his crotch to see if its been doctored
    Stay Calm, Be Alert, Think Clearly, Act Decisively

    CoH

  13. #13
    Tree Killer Senior Member Beirut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    8,168

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    The link that AdrianII provided is scary as hell.

    If it's true, heads should roll.
    Unto each good man a good dog

  14. #14
    Senior Member Senior Member English assassin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    London, innit
    Posts
    3,734

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    BTW I refuse to look at his crotch to see if its been doctored
    Aha, so THAT's where he hid all those WMD then....

    "No, no, Herr Blix, that's not 40 tonnes of Sarin, I'm just pleased to see you..."
    "The only thing I've gotten out of this thread is that Navaros is claiming that Satan gave Man meat. Awesome." Gorebag

  15. #15
    RIP Tosa, my trolling end now Senior Member Devastatin Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    7,552

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    I hope I look that good in BVD's when I'm his age!!!
    RIP Tosa

  16. #16
    Ambiguous Member Byzantine Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,334

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Ser Clegane
    Good point - the fact that somebody in this prison leaked the pictures is actually more newsworthy than the fact that Saddam is wearing ugly underwear.
    Ugly? Oh no!

    *BP burns half his underwear in the backyard*

  17. #17
    Mad Professor Senior Member Hurin_Rules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Alberta and Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,433

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Showing such pictures is a violation of the Geneva Conventions. The US military has just said as much and is launching its own investigation. If it was US personnel who released the pictures, they have violated the conventions and will be charged.

    I do not think this will help the US in its war in Iraq, and in fact I believe it will hurt them. In some of the interviews I've read with Iraqis, they've perceived it as just more Americans humiliating Iraqis and breaking the laws of war. Whatever you think of the British newspaper (and I don't think much of it), this act probably increases the likelihood of attacks on British and American troops.
    "I love this fellow God. He's so deliciously evil." --Stuart Griffin

  18. #18
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Hurin_Rules
    Showing such pictures is a violation of the Geneva Conventions. The US military has just said as much and is launching its own investigation. If it was US personnel who released the pictures, they have violated the conventions and will be charged.
    And rightly so - the taking of these pictures by whomever was preventable if the NCO's and officers in charge of the security detail would of abided by the regulations that govern the housing of prisoners. After Abu Griab - I would of thought the NCO's and officers would of learned their lesson and ensured that camera's were not in the hands of soldiers who are on duty guarding prisoners.

    I do not think this will help the US in its war in Iraq, and in fact I believe it will hurt them. In some of the interviews I've read with Iraqis, they've perceived it as just more Americans humiliating Iraqis and breaking the laws of war. Whatever you think of the British newspaper (and I don't think much of it), this act probably increases the likelihood of attacks on British and American troops.
    I have heard two types of reports coming out of Iraq - some that follow just this line and one that some Iraqi's feel this is okay for the likes of Saddam. (however I don't know if that is a valid report or just some editorial information being relayed on the radio news that I listen to on the way to work.)
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

  19. #19
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
    Ugly? Oh no!

    *BP burns half his underwear in the backyard*
    We call those 'ballenknijpers' (ballstranglers) over here. These things are very bad for your sperm, but sometimes not being able to reproduce can be a good thing

  20. #20
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Hurin_Rules
    Showing such pictures is a violation of the Geneva Conventions. The US military has just said as much and is launching its own investigation. If it was US personnel who released the pictures, they have violated the conventions and will be charged.

    I do not think this will help the US in its war in Iraq, and in fact I believe it will hurt them. In some of the interviews I've read with Iraqis, they've perceived it as just more Americans humiliating Iraqis and breaking the laws of war. Whatever you think of the British newspaper (and I don't think much of it), this act probably increases the likelihood of attacks on British and American troops.
    Come on, Hurin. You wear the same kind of ballstranglers as Uncle Sadman in the pic, that's what's really bothering you.


    And no, I don't think Sadman's pants are a matter for the Security Council.
    Last edited by Adrian II; 05-20-2005 at 20:58.
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  21. #21
    Mad Professor Senior Member Hurin_Rules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Alberta and Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,433

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by AdrianII
    Come on, Hurin. You wear the same kind of ballstranglers as Uncle Sadman in the pic, that's what's really bothering you.
    LOL

    No, I gave up on those in first year undergrad, when I realized the reaction most women have to them. After a brief (pun intended) flirtation with boxers, I realized 3/4 briefs (black) were the way to go (as Seinfeld's Kramer once said, my boys need a home). Ever since, my love life has picked up considerably. Let that be a lesson to you Capo, as you look for advice on picking up that girl you were after: make sure you ditch the whitey tighteys before things get hot and heavy.
    "I love this fellow God. He's so deliciously evil." --Stuart Griffin

  22. #22
    RIP Tosa, my trolling end now Senior Member Devastatin Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    7,552

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Boxers all the way baby...

    Again, I just hope I look that good when I'm an old fart...
    RIP Tosa

  23. #23
    Member Member Alexander the Pretty Good's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,979

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    I'm no expert, but Barocca's judgement looks sound.

    I'm a boxers man meself.

    The link that AdrianII provided is scary as hell.

    If it's true, heads should roll.
    If true, heads should not only roll, but be punted. Very far.
    Last edited by Alexander the Pretty Good; 05-20-2005 at 21:54. Reason: Boxers...

  24. #24
    Member Member Kanamori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    1,924

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    "If it's true, heads should roll."

    I don't know about that, but more than a dishonorable discharge is certainly in order. Incidences like this and my lai make me think that the US military chain of command needs some rethinking...they were allowed into a similar situation that they were under question for; not good at all. Frankly, it is disgusting and shameful.

    edit: would they be going to the court marshal, or a domestic court?
    Last edited by Kanamori; 05-20-2005 at 22:07.

  25. #25
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Hurin_Rules
    (..) I realized 3/4 briefs (black) were the way to go (..)
    Spoken like a man.

    BTW I think I know what Sadman is looking for in the pic.

    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  26. #26
    probably bored Member BDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    5,508

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot


  27. #27
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Redleg
    And rightly so - the taking of these pictures by whomever was preventable if the NCO's and officers in charge of the security detail would of abided by the regulations that govern the housing of prisoners. After Abu Griab - I would of thought the NCO's and officers would of learned their lesson and ensured that camera's were not in the hands of soldiers who are on duty guarding prisoners.
    Well, I tend to think that the photos were "official" as part of documenting his treatment ect. If he gets to trial and claims he was beaten bloody everyday in custody, some pictures could be helpful to refute it. The problem is that someone had access to the photos, who clearly shouldn't have, and leaked them to the press- presumably for a large sum of money.

    Hopefully their investigation will find this person and prosecute him/her.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  28. #28
    Mad Professor Senior Member Hurin_Rules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Alberta and Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,433

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave
    Boxers all the way baby...
    Those are fine--I think there are some women who prefer them--but I think that we can all agree that unless you are gay and/or a member of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, whitey tighteys are to be avoided at all costs.
    "I love this fellow God. He's so deliciously evil." --Stuart Griffin

  29. #29
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanamori
    "If it's true, heads should roll."

    I don't know about that, but more than a dishonorable discharge is certainly in order. Incidences like this and my lai make me think that the US military chain of command needs some rethinking...they were allowed into a similar situation that they were under question for; not good at all. Frankly, it is disgusting and shameful.

    edit: would they be going to the court marshal, or a domestic court?
    Military crime - Courts Martial
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

  30. #30
    Member Member Kanamori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    1,924

    Default Re: US anger at Saddam underwear shot

    okay, i wasn't sure how their status as mercenaries factored in.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO