It wasn't quite clear from your post what you meant. I thought you meant Newsweek retracted the 2003 article, which they didn't as far as I know. And yes, the Times is doing a decent job, as is the Post. They're big papers with a lot of clout and they often use it in impressive ways. Besides, I've come to know some of the Times' staff. I've worked with them on the Khan case, so I was in a position to compare the things they wrote in their paper to the things we discussed and the sources we used on the ground, and they were certainly professionals.Originally Posted by Gawain of Orkeny
Bookmarks