In today's NYT, this article, tackles the newly aggressive, guns blazing approach favored by the UN in the Congo.
Would that be the same new aggressive UN that did the same during the 60-64 troubles in the Congo . It was widely criticised at the time , many countries refused to pay their contributions for the operation due to the UN taking sides in the conflict (which nearly bankrupted the organisation) . But on the whole it worked .
Isn't it crazy , 40 years down the line and the same conflicts are being repeated .