No more so than siege towers.Originally Posted by Es Arkajae
Actually, I did a bit of testing and ladders get more people onto the walls in the same amount of time than siege towers do. And while the casualty rate may be higher sometimes, every now and then a full siege tower will go up in flames, taking out the whole unit, which then blows your average casualty rate apart. I'd take 15 losses every time on the ladders, compared to 5 losses most times, and about 1/5 times lose an entire unit due to the tower going up in flames.Originally Posted by Es Arkajae
Well I disagree. Ladders get more men on, split the defence, and provide just as much impact on the walls as that of siege towers.Originally Posted by Es Arkajae
Well you are lucky. I've seen towers not line up properly and have men fall down between the tower and walls, rendering the entire tower useless.Originally Posted by Es Arkajae
Also the towers are risky, because you can lose them all, rendering you unable to get inside. Ladders never "die" (or at least I've never seen it happen).
I'll give that the (ridiculously stupid) repeating ballista for epic walls makes towers worth it though. But you can't take ladders then anyway, so it's a moot point.
Bookmarks