Quote Originally Posted by Papewaio
The Consitution is subjective.

If it was set in stone then there would never have been the need to have a panel of Judges vote on particular subjects or if they voted on a 'non-changing' document it would have to be 100% for or against and then the decision becomes unchangeable just like a Papal decree.
Sorry, I don't buy that argument. That's like saying that if a criminal code is written clearly there is no need for trials for the accused. Clearly there is a need for courts- but their decisions should still be based on the letter of the law and letter of the Constitution not their personal morals or what they percieve to be a right.